I am back on, after last night, to check on the devastation . To reiterate, I am still disgusted by what SR said to Chico. I fully admit that I asked the Mods to lock the thread, it had the potential to go even more nuclear than it already had. I have never asked the Mods to do anything before, and it will be a long time before I ask again. I think the board should be open to comment, provocative comment and to banter. You can always step away if you don't like it. I asked SR to apologise, since I cannot believe he really meant it and when he cooled down/sobered up he would regret what had happened. He wouldn't and started again on their board....so he deserves it all. It is a shame, because in his latest incarnation, he was fairly tolerable. I never appreciated his misogynistic outlook, but heho I have met far worse however retrospectively I can see the increasing paranoia and aggression building. I am sure he will be back, he may already be here as I don't think sku is banned. Sku seems to be the acceptable face of Secret squirrel. And perhaps that may be a clue to the behaviour patterns, and perhaps we have been dealing with a sick/ill person and not a sick/nasty person.
Here we go again! Sigh! I thought my ironic signature put this to bed once and for all. Ok. Normally I keep it light on these boards, but I now call on the mods to confirm once and for all that my IP address has never ever corresponded with CernyBerny or Secret Ranger. Better still go back to the old BBC site and do the same too. Then look through the posts if you wish and cross compare the tone, phraseology and vocabulary. If that's not good enough, then find the posts where I've shared personal details - the fact I'm a director, work in the construction industry, married, have three children, live near Oxford, etc. I'm not from Watford, don't work in IT, etc, etc. If anyone seriously thinks that I have the inclination or desire to harbour two accounts to share opinions then they are sadly wrong. I am sorry to disappoint you all. One final point. Again look through my posts and find any that harbour any animosity or personal insults. I enjoy the forum, try to keep it light and actually enjoy banter with the contributors on here. Not least CernyBerny / Secret Ranger - who I actually think has a very dry sense of humour that is misinterpreted by many on here. I haven't seen his latest posts, I've been working far too hard to spend any time on here lately - again check my posts and you'll see a drop in activity of late. If he's said or done something wrong then so be it. I'm beyond caring. But please don't try to smear my profile on here by making rash assumptions that simply aren't true. I'll lighten it up a bit for you by paraphrasing Micky Flanagan - 'you lot are going to have to stop colluding in the illusion' that my profile is a shill or duplicate account. I hope that clears things up for you gents (and Beth). As you were.
If this is true Sku I apologise. I know nothing about where you work or what you do (even though we cannot be very far apart, I am near Oxford too) My inference comes from a single post on a single thread, when it appeared that you (Sku) answered a question directed to Cerny in a way that only Cerny could have the information for. And no I have not got the time or inclination to go back and find the thread....but others will remember too...and as you too are intelligent and coherent you will probably remember too. In fact I no longer care, you're here and I actually you bear little of the Squirrel traits. so lets get on with it and get down to the nitty gritty of worrying about Everton
I am very pleased with the whole outcome and sorry again but I feel a massive justice has been done. It's about liking someone as they have the qualities to give and take IMO Most things at this level on a forum should be able to be defused with banter in context I pushed back at Swords early on as that's in my nature and invented cross dressing for him ... So much so that he actually wears ladies clothes now His references to me being gang banged in Brighton are right on the money as is his statements about my time at mental institution It never gets nasty why should it? It's a great forum ... There's the difference To ban people and get nasty IMO opinion is poor I like Cerny's comment about SB73 name ... Shocking stuff and its left SB scared I am sure Whole thing is a good laugh IMO Back to Business Everton today
Thank Kiwi .... not been on this board much before .... seems like you have a good bunch of fans posting
In the words of the blessed Saint of Luxeuil who spake unto the masses "defused with banter in context " P*** off Aussie
Spot on mate. I thought it was only me that thought his pills post was out of order. Mods can we ban him for his wumming. Mods had to close the thread & it was clearly aimed at a "fellow QPR poster" on our own board. Rules are rules regardless aren't they..regardless of what anyones circumstances are...apparently! Have to ask in public, so I don't get acused of taking sides. Swords got banned for a bad comment SR got banned for losing it Chico should get banned for wumming on our board. his personal circumstances are no excuse..as posted in our last post stating our rules... my personal circumstances were not accepted as a reason to defend my ban..so neither should his be. Mods?...I'll copy and paste this in a Pm if it makes you feel better..let me know...thanx This aint meant to be ontroversial mods, but if the rules apply to us, then they also apply to our visitors..all of them Please take the necessary action thank you.
ABSOLUTE GARBAGE...... Many of us on here including Col watched as you had a conversation with youself and when you got to the bit about coming to London, you answered using the wrong identity. Many including Stamford, Col and myself picked up n it and commented on it! If I could be arsed or bothered to play these boring games, i'd try to look it up, but to be honest...I don't care those of you who are doubting this, please ask Col and Stamford (2 of our more respected posters)for confirmation. cant believe we are supposed to believe this after calling you out on it only a couple of months ago.. Unless im getting sku mixed up with sku1974 or what ever...!
ABSOLUTE GARBAGE...... Many of us on here including Col watched as you had a conversation with youself and when you got to the bit about coming to London, you answered using the wrong identity. Many including Stamford, Col and myself picked up n it and commented on it! If I could be arsed or bothered to play these boring games, i'd try to look it up, but to be honest...I don't care those of you who are doubting this, please ask Col and Stamford (2 of our more respected posters)for confirmation. cant believe we are supposed to believe this after calling you out on it only a couple of months ago.. Unless im getting sku mixed up with sku1974 or what ever...!
I have to say that I thought he lived in a complete fantasy land mate......hard to believe a word he said. And no.....I'm not at all surprised at this outcome.
I think enough damage has already been done here and it is time to move on. Q, if you wish to complain about wums from elsewhere I'd suggest you follow the agreed procedure and PM the mods with thread links and post numbers. As for Sku, his grammar is vastly superior to SRs, I believe him.
A couple of people who I won't name have suggested to me that SR could well be mentally unstable. Reading Beth's post, I really am wondering if that is the case? Either way, it's over and done with. For the record, I do still harbour doubts over whether Sku and SR are in fact the same person and that particular thread where Sku and SR seemed to get their identities muddled up was more than a tad weird! But if Sku IS SR, I'm sure all will unravel overtime. Anyway.....who cares? It was a funny thread!! Time to move on methinks.
