Good question that, & you could argue both ways tbh, I'm sure BR would make a good case for the latter, whereas imo it's largely the former. Time will tell mate.
I think its a combination of both. You can't play 433 with two attacking FBs and one DM. We either stop the FBs getting forward so much or sure up the midfield, got to be a second DM imo.
We just have to believe he knows what he's doing. We're certainly attacking better. Lucas will be back to 100%.
Bit of both maybe, but the main problem is playing the same system in every game regardless of the opposition. No matter how much faith you have in a system it will not suit every game, you have to have a second option for when you are beig closed down and over-run.
This Only the ******ed miserable scousers fans would have been taken in by his laughable claims...all other fans would have seen through him straightaway.
Rodgers is a bit of an exhibitionist. Probably trying to emulate his mentor Mr Mourinho but the results on the field have shown him to be a clown. So from now on, whatever he says should be considered to be an attempt at humour.
we've changed formation and style fairly regularly not sure where the impression that's it's straight up 4-3-3 every match comes from
And you've gone out all the cups earlier than last season and same position in the league....the progress is staggering really
Liverpool come out with more cringe worthy bullshit than any other club on earth (that stupid TV programme, making their 2005 Champions League victory into a play, their nauseating song before every match where they try and remind everyone that they haven't always been ****, etc).
Nice to see how much Liverpool bother you still. btw, the way you change your name every time a new player shows up, proof of plasticity
depending on the topic you can almost be guaranteed to be on the opposite side of Liverpool fans, or as has been shown on this board, licking United ball to make a point because Everton are **** all use in that repspect
