No digressing, where the bloody **** is matth? With the malware situation behind us, we are ready to start anew and more importantly, with serious contribution (though nonsensical at times) from our dear matth.
True, when you see what IS allowed on here it seems daft to ban him. He just can't keep himself on the United board. It keeps things ticking over on here, it's dead without him.
It could be worse, we could be on the Liverpool board. Different day, same old ****; This man will NEVER let it lie! I wish I had his life.
haha, donga has one bad, bad obsession with the 'injustice' of the St Suarez case. I reckon he knows every word of the 115 page report verbatim.
Ya he's like Cleverly innit, keep things ticking over. We might have to start a guessing game. What avatar has matth currently taken, what form is he in, or am I matth?
This is not sensible. Lets not keep banning matth at the drop of a hat.Or was he on a wumming rampage on other boards, if so then, a mod could have a word with him. But lets not ban next day.
Agreed There are others who are are 100% more deserving of a ban IMO. for example that ******ed toolsuckingSisu (or BBFool using his previous username) comes here to constantly wum and the mods cant be arsed to ban him although he is supposed to be banned...
Well it actually wasn't me this time, but what happened was he was wumming the Chelsea board, and when a board ban was requested by their mods, brb took the decision to make it a site ban. Which is fair enough given that having returned from being banned about 87 times, with the supermod making a personal "i know you're here" appearance. Of course he was going to be on thin ice! His actions didn't exactly scream out that it was going to be different this time round did they? People pointed out at the time, with brbs attention he needed to be careful. He wasn't. Nobody's fault but his. I'm not prepared to allow him back again. I'm sorry but we've given him a ridiculous number of chances already. In terms of having a word with him, if you had seen the sheer volume of ignored warnings, closed threads, friendly words in the ear, temp bans over the last year and a half... It's pretty clear he's never going to get it. I can't say how much of that is really his fault, but we can't accommodate it either way.
If that really was the case then, fair enough. Just one thing, do the mods also check the actual contents of the posts or just do it on the basis of cries for ban. For what I know, matth may be over the top, but it was all due to naïvety or over-zealousness (like how he got sick before Madrid match).