According to the Daily Express: http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/386564/Sunderland-eye-David-Moyes I know this is only Journo bulls*** but still I wouldn't mind it happening. While I always wanted MON in the first place, I think maybe he isn't the manager for us. I rate David Moyes very highly, and always thought he would get the Man Utd job once SAF retires. Do you think he would come to us? Do you even think MON will walk or get sacked??
He's a top class manager. He's made Everton into a top 6 team on a shoe string budget. However I think this report is a load of Bull!
Totally agreed, b.s. didn't even read the article, why on earth would he come here, oh except wonga, Potential,
Guys it's not April the 1st, there is more chance of gazza taking over Moyles is destined for the top not a move backwards to a club is skint and fighting for their lives I would not even suggest he would come to us You say we are delusional
I think there's some mileage in this story because if Moyes does leave Everton he was going to have a complete break from football, so taking over at Sunderland fits the bill....
Thought you said Tash for a second there ROFL. You all hate me so much that the word "Tash" has replaced "****" as an insult. XD
Skint?? Since when?? Our chief exec stated that the loss was expected due to the investment bin the academy etc. We're far from Skint. As for delusional, how many SAFC fans have you seen that would believe thus? I'd love a manager of that level. But also know it'd never happen
Home > Sport > Football 13 NEWS Bleak Cats: Sunderland reveal £27m loss.. that doesn't include £20m Fletcher and Johnson buys Charlie Crowhurst By Simon Bird | 22 Mar 2013 22:31 Martin O’Neill is facing a fight for transfer-market cash with his Sunderland boss Ellis Short after the club revealed a £27million loss. O'Neill retains Short's backing, but the tycoon will order a major review of the Black Cats' footballing operation at the end of the season. US businessman Short will have to dig deep yet again if O’Neill is to get his wish to rebuild his squad quickly, after the club announced yet another massive loss - one which doesn’t even include the combined £20m spent Steven Fletcher and Adam Johnson last August. Sunderland’s turnover was £78m in the year ending July 31, 2012, but their player trading and amortisation, wage bill and match costs totalled £104m - leaving Short to decide how long he goes on subsidising the Wearsiders. Despite Sunderland's run of seven games without a win, which has them a worrying four points off the relegation zone following last Sunday's draw at home to 10-man Norwich, Short remains “protective” of O’Neill. However he is also unhappy that his massive investment in players is not reaping rewards in terms of league position. The previous year’s loss was more than £30m. Short hoped his subsidy of tens of millions in covering losses since his takeover would banish the fear of relegation forever and elevate the Wearsiders into the top 10. However, Sunderland still have a squad short on numbers and more importantly quality - and Short wants a better scouting system to unearth gems from abroad. O’Neill wants to revive Sunderland quickly, not hang around the lower reaches, and it will be a key summer for him and Short as they map out the club's future - and, more importantly, decide on a transfer budget. “Things have not gone our way recently but we are certainly not looking for excuses,” said O'Neill. “We are simply looking to get on with the job of producing the results we want. “When you have not won for a while pressure to win the net game gathers momentum but that is part of football. Maintaining self-belief is essential.” SAFC chief executive Margaret Byrne said: “Our results reflect a period where we embarked on a programme of continued investment in the playing squad, choosing to retain the services of those players that the manager identified as key to the team. “We also invested significantly in our Academy in order to secure EPPP Category One status and give us the best possible chance to develop young players for the future. "Our net operating loss has reduced slightly and we are continuing to implement a structureensure sustainability for the future Short changed? How much more money will Martin O'Neill be given to spend? SECTIONS SEARCH Home | Desktop Text size A A A Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookies © MGN Ltd
As someone obviously so intelligent I'd have thought you'd have already known that this has already been discussed to death on another thread. Happen I read you wrong?
