Beefy's Corner.......For all off Topic threads

Same if Monreal is worth 10m Shaw must be worth about 30m.

 

Considering how much money some players go for, I'd be absolutely gutted to get any less than £25m for Shaw.

 

I'm guessing they meant Lord Strathclyde - the clue that he isn't an MP is kind of in the name.

 

Caroline Lucas was all I had!

 

Naturally I got Ian Paisley.

 

Thanks and Thanks

 

Nor would I. We don't need to sell, we are looking good to be in the PL next season so why would Shaw leave? Assuming we stay up, he will get regular PL football at a good club with a bright future.

 

The new Die Hard is ****ing ****!

 

That isn't stupid enough money, as far as I'm concerned. If [and that's a mighty big if], I was going to be happy letting our best players go, I'd want to make sure the buying club didn't have a hope of making a profit in years to come. Now, in the case of Walcott and Oxlade-Chamberlain, that may come to pass, as Arsenal have managed to limit their progress. Bale, on the other hand, is going to make Spurs a pretty penny, if he eventually goes. That's not to be allowed any more.

 

As soon as I found out that it was rated 12A and that they had edited "yippee kay yay mother ****er" to without the last word in it I thought **** this, it will be awful.

 

I knew it would be awful when I saw Die Hard 4.

 

The plot is actually ok, it's just the guy who plays his son is awful. He is so wooden I not sure how he even got out of Acting school. In fact him having a son is the thing that ruins the whole film, if it was just Bruce then I actually think it would be a good film.

 

All of the stupid over the top crap from Die Hard 4.0 is gone, it's back to basics. The plot is of a good standard but him having a son in it just ruins it. Plus the guy that plays the son is probably the worse actor I have seen.

 

To be fair, the first 40 minutes - hour of Die Hard 4.0 was good, the plot was rather interesting.

 

The plot may be good, but it should have been made to a 15 rated standard at the very least.

 

I agree and no son

 

Fine no son but I have to take your word for that as I haven't seen the 5th one, and I doubt I ever will!

 

None of the Die Hard films were good.

 

I'm glad I never paid for it, would have made it even worse.

 

Didn't mind first two Die Hards...though what's the chance of these two perils happening to the same guy. The baddies were better actors than Bruce Willis.