I was half expecting you to enter the debate against me at some point - since I've argued pretty strongly against the existence of the Church before
I know Michael. I'm not going to criticise anyone for doing what they feel is best for their kids as long as there is a rationale behind it. In this instance it is to ensure their education is all that it can be. If that is Catholic schooling, then so be it. From your own education you may respect the ethos if not the faith. You wouldn't be considering it if you thought it would damage their sensibilities. Even if that doesn't come from your own education and it comes from your view of that particular school then the message idea is the same. The two lads on this site who went to your school are both Atheists (misguided Catholics ) so it doesn't harm your capacity to think your way out of it. To make a long story short. I ain't judging.
Nice one, thanks. That Thomas Ligotti book sounds absolutely magic. But if you were looking for an argument aganst the existence of the human race, Administrator, you should have come to me first: I would have presented it in an engaging, easy-to-read and thoroughly laddish manner, replete with a winning line in self-deprecation and a heart-warming inclusiveness that would make everyone feel able to join in. I imagine we would have marvelled at my ability to make difficult subject matter readable and enjoyable for the man in the street, to be honest. An opportunity missed. Anyway, I suspect I would enthusisatically agree with everything in Ligottiâs book right up until the point I have children. I would then be presented with the difficult task of explaining to myself why my own children were somehow miraculously exempt from my low level contempt and why they deserved to survive and be taken seriously. More likely, however, is that my entire world view would collapse around me and would need urgent modification or rebuilding. As for the boring stuff, I know what you mean. You have to be in the right sort of mood, I suppose, or simply treat these things as a thought exercise. There is no real escaping the fact, however, that many of these egg-headed philosophical types are very bad at imparting ideas (for all their relentlessness) and very bad at writing. Itâs sometimes hard to avoid the suspicion that it would really please them to think that other people may find their ideas impenetrable â which is a crime against education â and that they revel in their own perceived intellectual magnificence. (If youâve ever read a pamphlet distributed on the street by an earnest Marxist or far-left type, you may have already been familiar with this self-defeating, wholly unimpressive and, by definition, anti-intellectual trait. Come to think of it, arty types explaining their work and practice are often similarly afflicted by the need to spout self-bolstering jargon and impeccably fatuous bullshit.) But I digress, sorry. Back to everything else later. (Taking the dogs to the beach now, as you may have guessed from experience. I've nothing else going on in my life, let's face it.)
Hmm. I know itâs merely a throwaway comment and at the risk of becoming embroiled in a stramashâ¦.. â¦..being a Celtic supporter and hating Irish people seems perfectly compatible to me. I canât see why being a Celtic supporter would disbar such a thing or make it any less likely? I canât see why anyone would waste precious energy or time hating Irish people, right enough â or anyone much at all â but thatâs another thing altogether. In fact, maybe itâs even more likely that certain Celtic supporters will hate the Irish, given that their sole or predominant experience of Irishness may have been distorted, week in, week out, by being exposed to a brand (or strand) of Irishness that may give the appearance of fetishising war and war deeds (which is to say, violence), martyrdom and victimhood, whilst trampling indifferently over the sensibilities of others and simultaneously attempting the seeming trick of clinging to a fondly imagined moral superiority â which is based, as far as I have ever been able to tell, on precisely nothing? It can hardly lay any claim whatsoever to being the prime or authentic voice of Irishness, true, but this fact may be somewhat lost in the bedlam, serving the unfortunate purpose of hardening opinions and sowing greater societal discord â and yes, possibly leading to (a self-defeating) hatred. As a means of saying âWeâre Irish, youâre going to listen to our stories (whether you like it or not), love us and feel our painâ, it is perhaps unique in its counterproductive ineffectiveness - unless you were minded to buy into this very particular way of thinking to begin with, of course, which is hardly an expression of cultural inclusiveness. But there we are. Personally speaking, for all its terrible, terrible faults (and seemingly willful blindness to these faults), I love Ireland and, by grudging extension, the Irish (even you, darling Administrator) â which is why, amongst other things, I recently became an Irish citizen. If I wanted to find an example of the least appetising, most grimly self-fixated, mawkishly self-loving aspect of Irishness, however, I would struggle to find an immediately better example than Celtic Park - and the apparent mindset of a (possible) minority of supporters therein. To witness Irishness (and Irish politics) being reduced to this humiliating pastiche of grievance and lament is painful in the extreme. Ireland is so much better than that. Bring back Stereotypist. If what you say is true, his demented hatred will serve as a useful cultural counterbalance against the weeping balladeers and will surely show the Scotch-Jocks in a favourable light. Anyway, because Iâve become seriously distracted and spent far too long on this, Iâll just have to say âno worriesâ to everything else you said â it made for good, interesting reading. And thank you, of course, and sorry for going on. Iâll probably need to reserve the right, however, to question your judgment in giving tacit approval to a sectarian schooling system and raising your children as bigots. (My wife went to one of these schools for about six years, Mickita, and I can barely step through the hall without tripping over needlessly sinister rosary beads and crosses and stuff â never minding the piles of heavy-going literature outlining the moral necessity of aligning oneself with Nazis and fascists and gruesome dictators at every available turn. If thatâs what you want for your kids, though, fair enough. If they start hoarding despicable levels of wealth under their My Little Pony mattresses and do everything they can to avoid paying tax whilst showing a propensity for stealing great works of art, however, youâll know the game is up. Just donât come crying to me, okay?)
It`s not called bum rape if you agree beforehand, it`s called ***ging....The Catholics sneak up in the dark.
George Orwell made the salient point (later rehashed by Hitchens) that the Nationalistic extremities are always on the fringes of the nation - Napoleon was from Corsica, Hitler from Austria, Stalin from Georgia, and of course the most extreme form of Britishness is in Northern Ireland residing in the same territory as the most extreme form of Irishness. I suppose to a lesser extent it is also true of Scotland, where you have two competing allegiances. For whatever reason people who believe that their tribal identity is under threat (or may not be obvious to a casual onlooker) feel the need to promote their identity more so than those who have no reason to be unconfident in their identity. I don't agree at all that if I was to choose a Catholic school that my children will become bigots - are you saying that all children who go to Catholic schools come out bigots? That would be almost the entire population of southern Ireland - that's a bit bigoted of you . In England and her surrounding islands no one cares about who comes from what sect of Christianity. In reality it'll be a couple of years of hopefully higher quality Primary education before moving to secular secondary education - the Church wouldn't have a chance at counter-indoctrinating my atheist off-spring anyway (when your teacher is discussing the Bible make sure you keep asking her where the Dinosaurs are, etc ).
Apropos nothing at all really the local Padre was telling me that they couldn't build a community centre on a particular piece of land because archaeologists had found something on the site from 100000 BC. "Wow That is quite something considering your wee book tells us the world only goes back to 4004BC".... He wasn't sure if I was joking or not. There is a confusion in this thread between faith schools and faith teaching.
If you take the faith teaching out of faith schools then they're just... schools. Don't think anyone has a problem with those.
Pretty simple to follow, A faith school that doesn`t teach a particular faith is just called a school. This does not make all schools faith schools, are you being intentionally dim Rebel?
My school was a faith school but never taught Scientology - which is a particular faith. Is it now just a school? Nah only kidding - I know what you are saying.
No, it comes naturally. What is your excuse? Read his contribution again. The logic of this is that only schools that do teach about faith are faith schools. Given that every state school does, every school must be a faith school. You are free to interpret his post as you see fit. I'll concentrate on what was actually said.
We had GCSE RE ,the teacher and kids knew it was completely pointless, i think the Rugby coach taught the class . I don`t even remember having any coursework ,but that was 23 years ago....
Dank U, Miguel. (Trying my hand at Dutch.) I canât think what to say in response to the George Orwell observation, except for âinterestingâ. (Iâm narrowing my eyes and saying it in a drawn out way, however, whilst stroking my long grey beard, if that helps.) On the surface, it seems fairly insightful, but I simply donât know enough about the world to be certain it stands up to further scrutiny. I think thatâs probably true, though, about people needing to forcibly project their identities if they feel them to be under threat. Iâm not entirely sure that this is related, but Iâd estimate the intensity (or otherwise) of my Scottish nationalism was diluted to the tune of roughly 50% just the moment we got devolution. It was also round about this time that I stopped caring for the Scottish national football team â although wasting my money following them to the World Cup in France played a significant role in my tantrummy disillusion. Either way, it just didnât seem all that important anymore, and I suspect I had been using the team as a vehicle for something more than mere sport. (Which feels excruciatingly embarrassing, in retrospect.) No, if my sources are to believed â and they are, Iâve read widely on this â theyâll be teaching them exorcisms and all sorts. I also donât think itâs an exaggeration to say that the school canteens tend to garnish the sandwiches with wafer thin slices of Protestant. If thatâs not bigotry, I donât know what is. How much evidence do you actually need? Get a grip, ffs, you're just embarrassing yourself now.