That's a poor excuse for not having enough substance behind an opinion so that you can bat away all comers with facts. If someone then chooses to be contrary for the craic then they won't get far will they?
Well, I thought you had a shred of honesty, some of your arguments were so weak it was obvious you just wanted to argue and wind up by disagreeing armed with the flimsiest arguments. I aint holding it against you but there you go again. I aint getting into it Tobes, you are what you are.
You aren't getting into it, as your 'theory' has **** all substance & you can't back it up. Thanks for proving my point.
Being clever, if you think you are you probably ain't, if others think you are then you might be. I think it works that way. I can be as wrong wrong wrong as anybody, I won't deny that but I have no inflated sense of self esteem nor do I think I am so clever, some do and it's so crystal in the way they word their posts They hit reply and sit back with a smug sense of self satisfaction.
I know I do. But then I have the same look on my face when I take a piss too. Same Ievel of intellectual effort involved too!
Can't accept that as being true. If you really think for one moment about the number of decisions that have to be made by your eyes, your hands, your bladder then the brainpower involved is far far higher than some of the effort put into some posts - no names no pack-drill!
People just don't know what's good for them as a group, individually we are all sure but as a group no one has a fkn idea, that's why we need Mods.
Didn't really use the Banter thread that much, mainly due to the bickering that goes on, it's a Shane though.
Haven't seen the film but just read the Wiki write-up of the plot. It's so convoluted that it would demand higher than normal brain function just to understand who was conning who!!
