Couple of questions then: 1.What if, in wider consultation, a majority of City Fans favour no safe standing and more exec boxes? 2.What if the FL/FA do not agaree that safe standing can go ahead? 3.In terms of design, the roof will be designed by the architects and the acoustics expert so they'll be responsible for that aspect within planning & financial constraints. 4.The thing that makes the most noise will be the fans and I haven't experienced anything wonderful, noise wise from the EE, this season.I'm not being horrible and I'm in favour of a home fans only, partly safe standing EE and I've campaigned for both, however, the last time I can remember real noise was when we played Coventry and then it came from all around the ground and the £10ea had a lot to do with that? 5.In terms of building regs, safety laws etc, I'd be very surprised if you got a replica EE that was entirely safe standing due to the number of people who want to routinely stand especially if we're relegated.Stay in the NPC and I wouldn't put the number at anymore than 1,200 or about or less than 10% of the current average. 6.I'd prefer to have SS in the central area behind the goal and I'd prefer to have the Exec Boxes in the Williams & Dolman only.That might not be possible with the rebuild of the Dolman and we may need the revenue from them to fund the football side so you can't just dismiss it then moan when we don't sign better players. Then again, none of this might happen if AV goes ahead, so who knows?
Chaps, I've decided not to post anymore replies to this thread or provide anymore information regarding either AV or AG revelopment on this forum. In closing, here is some well meant advice that you can take or leave, ref the stadium, new or redeveloped. 1.Find out who your FP Rep is via Dave Lloyd at BCFC.You'll need to tell DL where you sit/stand in the Ground. 2.That person can put forward views or you can bypass them and write/e mail yourself to Dave, Guy Price of Jon Lansdown. 3.Join the FP yourself. 4.Read The Minutes published on the OS, if you're interested. 5.Any developments on either stadium will be published on the OS and copied by the EP/THIS IS BRISTOL. 6.If you're in the EE,go to the EE meeting which will be advised to your FP Rep (Two for EE) and on the OS.No doubt, your FP Rep will be attending, so you can pass on your views via them, if you prefer. Good luck
1. silly question. they have not. lets have no fans just boxes. safe standing is a side issue. 2. get the design right because if you dont a safe standing area after all the ifs may have little appeal if the area it is in aint up to it. 3 crap stadium after crap stadium has been designed by these experts. 4, I have not either but good considering the football and miles than home fans at most away games. 5. Have not spotted any body suggesting build a replica but mentioning acoustics and tradition that sort of thing. 6. done already.
All I know is you must be much more important than me because you put all your posts in BOLD and that intimidates me.
Does it, it irritates me because I feel it like I want to show how important i am to you mere mortals
You hardly provided any information. "It might have high roofs roofed , it might not. It might have all have boxes, it might not. Wait for our design to come out. It doesn't matter anway look at Stoke etc" All you have done is create confusion. Piss poor for somebody who is meant to be representing fans.
I don't have the problem with surveys of fans you appear to have. ALL the ideas gathered from fans ... I think that may be untrue, because I do not re-call any open clarion call to put ideas forward. It is hard even now to understand how that can be done. Check your remarks regarding boxes v Blagdon Mikes and the need for boxes in the Eastend. One of you on this consultative fans parliament has to be wrong. So it then follows that all the ideas about flags, images etc cannot be done unless they interfere with the executive boxes sight lines. YOU are meant to be a "conduit" to them.
