Yeah golden rule, blah blah blah! I want to know something mate. We have never fallen out, in fact we know some of the same people in London, but I would like to ask you a question. Do you just argue for the sake of it, or are you just a wum? I think you start off as a wum, but then get pissed off, and I just want to know why you do it. Admittedly, I should have PM'ed you this question, but the GC is a bit quiet, so I just thought I would put it out there. I don;t believe somebody can jump on the wagon so quickly, as you do. My personal opinion is, you are not a bad **** for a fenian, and you just love an arguement, but I have been wrong before, think it was august '96. I thought i was wrong, but I was actually correct! If I knew how to do a poll, I would, but I don't, so I won't!
Occasionally I may illustrate points by citing things that I do not necessarily believe. Generally this is to undermine the argument of an individual poster who had written something to contradict themselves. The problem with this is that it is too subtle for other posters to pick up on which is obviously not their fault and often people folk are unaware they have been contradictory. I am aware of that and I don't mind people exploring opinions off the back of it. Some people invent arguments on my behalf. Carefully deconstructing arguments that were never made. If I am being criticised for things I have never said or intimated then I can't do much about that other than say so. There are 3-4 people who in my opinion are just hateful ****s. I call people all sorts on here but I don't carry it over to other areas of the forum except in those 3-4 instances.... Actually maybe 4-5.
You are just gutted that you weren't invited to Somalia with me, hash and ER to collect bees and then be pirates for the day. We were going to collect conkers, until I pointed out to hash that it was the wrong time of year.
