Yip, that's my concern. Larsson, N'Diaye and Sess. Suppose DG will play inbetween and link up when we go forward.
Just had £100 at 7/2 that says different Mush mate. N'Diaye will have to be on top form, as I sadly can't see Larsson stopping Lukaku unless it is with the daft free kicks he gives away.
Why the **** is MON playing 4-4-2?? Pre-historic formation, outdated and no place in the modern game. 72% possession in favour of west brom cos we cant control the midfield.
'Cept they can dominate the midfield and have wingers that drive their play forward, something our wingers can't do (particularly AJ, for whatever reason)
I agree, however, shows the system itself is not outdated. More that we have **** players, we have players with ability but there's no fight or bottle bar Sess & Gardner. Even Fletch is a ****ing fanny.
4-5-1 is ****. 4-4-2 is ****. Lavein's 4-6-0 is ****. Why do we need a manager at all. Why not just stick them in a 1-1-8 formation and let them play. This talk of a certain formation being **** is ****ing **** (bar Lavein's). Different formations for different games. Even still it won't always work.
Still time bonny lad, take off Larsson and put a FOOTBALLER there and jobs a guddun. I really like the look of N'Diaye get another reasonable footballer in there with him and WBA wont have it all their own way.
Just causing trouble I dont what ****ing formation is used, as long as it works. All this talk about which formation we should be using is nonsense, 4-5-1 can be attacking, just as 4-4-2 can be ****. I'm all for MON using 4-4-2 but he should introduce it slowly. Our team is used to having the extra man in midfield and they need time to adapt.
