I was sitting just to the left of the dug out in an isle seat. I realised about 30 mins in that my legs were on the steps with my kneecaps pointing towards their goal - such was our territorial domination that my whole body had swayed to observe only one half of the pitch. I'd argue that it was this that left us with a false sense of security at the back - the fact that they barely got into our half for long periods left us feeling as if there was little threat there.
Tell that to Barca <ANTIFOOTBALL> The biggest myth in Scottish football is the Celtic way is playing attacking football. The Celtic way should really mean, if you get beat, blame the ref.
Shouldn't be slagging off team mates in the press though. The fact is Lennon should not have picked him. Lennon "Are you fit to play?" Efe "Well gaffer, to be honest it was a fairly gruelling schedule of matches and I've just got back this morning after a long haul flight and I do feel a wee bit tired and drained and it may be a game too far for me but I'll go out and give it a shot and if I'm struggling you can always pull me off at half-time (fnarr, fnarr) and get some fresh legs on"
What isn't a myth that old Rangers style was , kick and bully the opposition into submission normally with the referee help . That's why John Greig got voted your greatest ever player , he could kick the hardest . That's where the myth !! started only one team tried to play football in a old firm game and it wasn't Rangers and people saw Celtic as the attacking team .
Think you're spot on Mick. They were camped in their own half for quite long spells but unfortunately for us, their defence was more than capable of soaking up pressure - which seems to be a common trait amongst good Italian teams - and their strikers were certainly very effective at availing of the slightest opportunity.
