Don't laugh at the Leicester ******s

I signed up as a Hull City fan wanting to talk to other Hull City fans on the Hull City forum.

 

Simple solution, mods move all his posts into here, those who want to banter with him can, the others who are for some reason getting annoyed get kept happy.

Today's show includes:

Did Proschwitz cost 2.6 million
Have Leicester spent lots of money
Does AKCJ like having a ****, hot debate on the allegations he's been subject to.
Should we leave the democracy in favour of a communism.
How amazing Jamie Vardy is

 

It's not a Hull City forum.

It's a Hull City section of a multi-club forum.

 

Those who get annoyed use the ignore function.

Those who want to debate, do so. Simple yet it seems so difficult for the residents of Hull.

I wouldn't be here if people don't respond to what I say? Would I?

The fact that people reply and debate with me suggests they want to.

I'm not happy about the idea of all my posts being moved without reason, either.

 

The Hull City section where Hull City fans chat. However, I don't blame you for not wanting to speak to Leicester fans

 

Fascinating. But what are your thoughts on today's topics?

 

The Hull City section is where the topic is Hull City. Anyone can post in here.

 

Have had a better idea.
Have put him on my ignore list - only one so far.

 

The problem with ignore lists is that you still have to read shyte you don't want to when posters use "Reply with Quote"

I would suggest people cease from replying with quote to certain posters, you could put FAO "X" at the top of the reply instead.

 

You would be here if people didn't respond because your sole purpose is to wind people up. You make a feeble cosmetic attempt to disguise this, but every comment you make on here has a barb aimed at hooking another fish.
TBH I don't care what you do because it's quite amusing to observe your little quest to make yourself a nuisance, as if you think you're a little soldier sent out by Square Head to fight behind enemy lines.

 

Is it a question of the importance of being earnest, or simply a matter of attention seeking ?

 

Yes, attention seeking.

Seeking attention from those who fancy a good debate.

 

No problem with debate, provided it's relevent to the topic.

Posting unconected ****e on several threads or trying to shift discussions to the same old tedious pissing contests doesn't fall into the definition of debate.

 

Your debate is only ever a petty argument about some minor detail irrelevant to the thread you start it on.

Your opinions are never the same as anyone else, always just an awkward, contrary stance which you cling to for hours at a time.

 

Replying to what people have said on topics classes as debate.

I don't just come on to threads with the intention of ruining it.

 

How much did Matt Mills and Beckford cost

 

4m and 2.5

Mills would have gone to 5.5 if we'd got promotion

 

I was wrong again - it's self-flagellation ain't it ?

 

It feels like it with some of the responses I get.

Makes you wonder why I bother.

Ah well, there's always one that can have a reasoned debate.