New footage proves you wrong http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...otage-supports-Belgian-claim-kicked-ball.html
no one said he didn't get the ball but he get a piece of the kid in the process too ? what part of that you don't get ? is to dangerous too do that ..
1- for GOD sake .. we agree he kicked the ball but in the process he get a piece of the kid too .. dose it show he didn't touch the player too? .. NO 2- he gone and apologized to the kid .. now explain to me what that means? did he apologized for kicking the ball without touching him? are you in drugs? bcz if that is the case he should never apologize and ask the kid to apologize instead .. going apologizing to him is big prove he got a piece of him too in the process
the full force would've hit the whole ball and possibly his shin would've kicked him, not going to hurt at all is it. he has not apologised to him for kicking him, hazard himself has still said he did not touch him.
Ban Hazard for 3 months, just to be sure, you don't kick poor defenseless kids with learning difficulties.
it is a boy we are talking about not a fully fitted adult.. how kicking him will not hurt him? so he apologized for what? oh wait .. if he didn't hurt him why he is visiting him then? dose it make sense to anyone? for GOD sake .. Hazzard himself is not sure .. how you can be sure?
and you think they can't sink lower defending their players blindely? i bet 1 billion pound if it was a UTD player , they wanted a minimum 1-2 months ban or FA are biased
HE WAS ****ING 17 STOP CALLING HIM A KID ****'s sake, Hazard's kick completely hit the ball and the kick wasn't even hard to begin with therefore his shin would've done absolutely zilch. I've got an 11 year old brother who would've made less of a fuss. are you seriously basing it on 'I think', he's clearly said he didn't touch him. How the **** could he not be sure, he was the one who did it.
you sound like ****ing Liverpool fans you lot, stop saying 'if it were a United player...' it wasn't, it was Hazard. You are such a dimwit it's unreal.
Nice one Drogs, Hazard says it so it must be so. Brilliant. I've always maintained there is a huge over reaction here but it's interesting you continue to overlook that he did not know he was 17. His age is irrelevant. Based on your defence, Cantona should have had no ban as the bloke he kicked had previous convictions and was a bnp member. It's ok to assault him then. Doesn't work like that.
I see this is going swimmingly.... You see that the 17 year old is apparently heir to some 42 million? He is also a LAD...
I agree, can't say often enough, that anything about say a four or five game ban would be way Ott but there are loads out there, been listening to radio quite a bit in the car today, saying "he was seventeen, he wasn't a kid" like that justifies the offence. It just doesn't. At all. Anyway, the initial desperation to have the book thrown at him is desperate and ridiculous, what possible difference will that make to us now? I don't care what ban he gets but I'm not having it that kicking ball boys is ok.
never said it was mate, but my argument is that he didn't kick the ball boy. We'll just have to agree to disagree, but we seem to be on the same level with one thing, the whole debacle/reaction to it is an absolute farce.
man .. Hazard himself in chelsea TV couldn't confirm it ... and said I think i kick the ball not the kid is hilarious those who says no he didn't touched him when Hazard himself is not sure
