Hazard

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
At 17 my son had enough sense not to do anything like that in the first place in case he got his head kicked in. I taught him well, and he knows that all actions have consequences. Plus if he had of been that stupid I would have told him it was his own fault.

So pratting around in a non threatening and violent way means you deserve a kicking?
Hazard was wrong...can you seriously not see that?
 
Drogs, the example given was a good one and given your reaction I guess you have no kids? If a man kicked your child in those circumstances how would you feel? It makes no difference if its in the park or a 'proper' game.

don't see what having kids has to do with it? I'm a fair bit older than Hazard so I would still class him a young lad same as I would the ball boy. Course it makes a difference, one is a man's career another is done as a hobby.
 
I was a bit annoyed with Hazard when he did it, but after reading this kids tweets, he sounds like a bit of a bellend.
 
For not doing his job and interfering with a football game. If a streaker is punished for delaying things so should a ball boy for hogging the ball no?
 
Drogs, the example given was a good one and given your reaction I guess you have no kids? If a man kicked your child in those circumstances how would you feel? It makes no difference if its in the park or a 'proper' game.

It wasn't a good example at all. A ball boy is employed by the club to retrieve the ball and return it to the field of play. A random teenager isn't employed to return the ball and it would also be an incredibly stupid move for a 17 year old to wind people up and not give them their ball back. The teenager in question would probably deserve a slight kick for being such a numpty.

Hazard was stupid and deserves whatever punishment he gets, but that was a poor example.
 
At first I was going to say both were in the wrong although more so Hazard by quite a bit, but after what I've read the little shit deserved it. Apparently he's 17 years old and brags about time wasting. What kind of a sad cunt is a ball boy in their late teens?
 
At first I was going to say both were in the wrong although more so Hazard by quite a bit, but after what I've read the little shit deserved it. Apparently he's 17 years old and brags about time wasting. What kind of a sad cunt is a ball boy in their late teens?

Still doesn't excuse Hazard booting him though. He can't afford to react that way, he should have left it to the ref to deal with the cocky little ****.