Harry killed a few Afghan ****s big deal. Now he's got a taste for blood they should put him in command of killing insurgents in Ulster.
What? To get more posh ****ers to join the army or an attempt to recruit other Playstation warriors who are convinced they could do better than the army because they clocked Call of Duty? The army needs poshies to be captains (Sandringham, Eton etc) and council estate unemployables to do the leg work and take the bullets. Not sure if the 3rd in line to the throne of England (and all her colonies) is a particularly good advert for your average army types. Especially when it has just been announced there will be 5000 redundancies any time soon. "Well done for all your hard work in Helmand sonny, here's your medal and your P45 now **** off" Help for Heroes? Yes, it's called a Job Centre.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/prince-harry-i-killed-talibanlooking-people,30991/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=SocialMarketing&utm_campaign=standard-post:headline:default.
He is a coward. Killing combatants who are unable to shoot back. Or does that just apply to others? Brits are the biggest hypocrites on earth when it comes to violence.
I don't see how killing people who do not have the requisite weaponry to return fire is cowardice. They did not have SAMs, that's just good planning.
They should never have such a high profile member of the British aristocracy fight in Afghanistan. Imagine the thoughts of an Afghan civilian on the ground, who is told that one of the British Royals is flying over his head with his hands on a joystick firing live rounds - and comparing it to an Xbox game. This vain attempt to make the Monarchy appear servile is being used by the Taliban to prove that the war is an Imperial one, and will no doubt help recruit more people who will shoot at British troops.
