So we've established that my original post doesn't quote Lennon. It doesn't claim to.
So we've established that my original post doesn't quote Lennon. It doesn't claim to.
So why say it? Why call the thread "100%" and ask a question about teams giving 100%?
Because you are a mong.
I wasn't aware that the title of every thread had to be a direct quote to what someone had said.
If you don't think that 'not competing' can't be interpreted to mean 'not trying' or 'not giving 100%' then there's no point debating with you or your bum chum stereo any further. That's certainly how Jim Jeffries interpreted it.
I wasn't aware that the title of every thread had to be a direct quote to what someone had said.
If you don't think that 'not competing' can't be interpreted to mean 'not trying' or 'not giving 100%' then there's no point debating with you or your bum chum stereo any further. That's certainly how Jim Jeffries interpreted it.

stereo?
monaural.
.
I wasn't aware that the title of every thread had to be a direct quote to what someone had said.
If you don't think that 'not competing' can't be interpreted to mean 'not trying' or 'not giving 100%' then there's no point debating with you or your bum chum stereo any further. That's certainly how Jim Jeffries interpreted it.
No, the opposite of stereo is monaural.
There's your poor grasp of basic English there again Wolsey.
Het spijt me vreselijk. Ik ben gewoon een domme Nederlandse jongen.
Yes you are. My ex-girlfriend was Dutch. She had a better grasp of English than you.
Excellent. Maybe you can give her a call and she can explain what 'not competing' means to you.
Excellent. Maybe you can give her a call and she can explain what 'not competing' means to you.