So to clarify the post you were talking about being deleted IS in fact there. The post t'other fool was claiming was deleted IS also still there? Now, instead of ruining threads with mod debates as some do, I simply delete the meaningless dross and posts relating to them. Your post falls into one or the other categories. The thing is, you on here squeal like stuck pigs when people post comments that disrupt threads, but then squeal like stuck pigs when we sweep away your meaningless dross that's liable to disrupt threads. When we left it previously, some of ours returned the favour on here and you cried about it. Me tidying up on there helps keep things tidier on here. You seem to want a situation where you can dish it out without any come back.
No, I have pointed out at least one post that I can't see there anymore. I don't really care to be honest, this argument is pointless and it's boring me.
When you say 'meaningless dross' is that the posts where you tried to argue that i'd heard booing when I clearly had?
I've posted a link to the one you wrongly claimed was deleted, and I've posted a broad explanation on what happened to the others. Most posters on our board have precious little interest in this spat you and a few of ours are having, so to them you just look like a boring tit ballsing threads up. As i suggested, when Leicester fans did this before, some of ours retaliated in kind and caused floods of tears on here. Sweeping nonsense posts and leicester v Hull pissing contests helps stop that happening again.<ok.
Nobody said you hadn't heard it. The post where you say that is still there as are the responses to it. it was the meaningless squawking that was tidied up.
Ha if we deleted every post from a Hull fan on here that could be classed as "meaningless squawking", then there would literally be no posts from you on here... Actually, that sounds quite appealing!
That would be amusing, but for the fact that you're one of those that litters this board will nonsense. Yet you have the power to remove similar posts on your own board. Therefore, shouldn't your responsibility as a moderator stretch beyond the Hull board? Otherwise you look like a bit of a hypocrite.
You said you hadn't heard 'plenty' and claimed it was because of where the microphones are placed when I heard it with my own ears. Something you said I hadn't because you claimed you'd sky+'d it and watched the ending. ****ing hell. Like pulling teeth
Except my posts are generally infrequent and usually limited to threads set up for us to post on. So really, you're once again wrong on most counts.
Generally or exclusively? I ask because they are two very different scenarios and I think you actually got something right for a change
Of course it did. The whole ****ing thread was about if you had/hadn't booed your side. I posted that you had having heard it on television whereas you decided that I was wrong.
I'm sure you believe that's the case. The fact the first few posts and several others confirm that some heard booing, seems to point to your perception of what the thread was about being bollocks.
I only post here when you lose, except for when I post when you've lost, drawn or not played. I think that says more about you.
Am I reading that right, you're questioning the deletion of a racist post? The standard thing to do if we remove a post is to remove the posts responding to it as well, otherwise the thread doesn't really follow. I've had to remove a few of AKCJ's posts today as well, because otherwise after deleting other posts on the thread he would have been talking to himself.
