Not really. We prefer it that way. Stay under the radar. But sadly i can see more of our games being on sky now.
Not really - for a city that doesn't exist. No motorway (M62 stops miles short); Trans-Pennine rail line doesn't reach here......
I feel like we have been on more this year than last already. We still have at least a couple more games on tv dont we?
Im not sure about the Cardiff game ellewoods, id have thought Sky would have waited till that time comes around to see what teams are playing for, get the most important games on.
to save starting another elmo thread, my west ham mate reckons they have bid 2 million for elmo. hoping this isnt true.
it was on football rumours earlier saying it was a £2.5mill bid. if it's true we have Rosie as cover and it's early enough in Jan to try and find a replacement although it would be a huge loss.
Certainly would. Whether it's bollocks or not he's going to be sought-after playing like this. If he's still here come Feb I'll be delighted.
oh right, my mate is a reporter , so thought might be something in it. cant say ive looked at the rumours site.
Would seem like a bad strategy. I cant see us bringing in Campbell and paying for Elmo. It would only be a good move if we didnt have a chance to get Campbell.
It's because we aren't Brighton or Leeds. For some reason when it comes to the Championship, the TV companies are more bothered about teams who used to be big, successful clubs (and Brighton) than the teams who actually are right now.
Could be to do with fan bases? Leeds seem to be on every week for example. I.e. more fans that'll watch. Maybe.
You spend more time on our board than you do on yours, shame the idiots on your board made you a mod as we now have to suffer your constant ****e drivel that you post on ours. Try to catch a bus will you , preferably the front end and do us all a ****ing favor. In case you get the idea I don't like you I DON'T
