Northern Irish Unionist in blaming other side for "breaking social exclusion rule" rather than seeing the problem with the rule in the first place shocker
It's actually pretty embarrassing that they are changing the whole league set up the minute Rangers aren't in the top flight ah but but but they wur gonnae dae it anywi
Given the speed they're ramming it through at, it's undeniable that Rangers absence is a factor. It's fair enough to say they might've looked at reconstruction if Rangers were in the SPL but I doubt it and, even if they were, it wouldn't come into play anything like this quickly.
Sorry I wasn't quicker petal, was having my lunch and out around town. Apologies. What other side are you talking about?
That which you are not on. It was deliberately transferable. What did you think I meant? Oh, aye, you were just being an obstinate ****. How silly of me.
please log in to view this image "Please be about something I can be offended about, please be about something I can be offended about" Dick.
they are lost without us Trev but won't admit it!! Celtic have lost 20 points already this season (they lost 21 points in total last season) yet they are still 9 points clear of Motherwell with a game in hand!! The SPL is a fookin joke!!! it needs expanding yet they still won't do it!!
This is why threads with you in them go on forever. Ask question. Answer question. Ignore point, ask another nigh-on rhetorical question about detail/semantics. Have earlier answer re-explained to you. Ask question (same question that's already been answered preferably). Repeat Ad Infinitum I answered your question. Indeed, it's hard to think of a more direct answer to your (let's not **** about) unnecessary and disingenuous question. And, predictably, you kidded on that the question wasn't answered. One then wonders why you asked the question as the reason you gave is ******ed - you genuinely didn't know what "other side" referred to when describing your response to two different situations with two different relevant examples? Dick.
You seem to be combining two issues, league size and lack of competition, and I don't think they're actually linked. How would a bigger top league make the title race more competitive? It'll be a one-horse race for a few years and in time back to a two horse race when your mob get back up there. The majority of seasons, the rest will be also-rans, whether it's 10, 12 or even 16 others - as it has been for 17 years or so.
It was a two horse race previous to 1995 and Celtic weren't one of them sunshine, remember the year you had to start up as Pacific Shelf. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. Not listening, not listening. P.S. How's married life going?
Isn't a pity that it appears Sevco haven't got full membership of the SFL and hence Cannot influence League structure in Scottish Football . It must be a major disappointment For the few hundred Rangers supporters who transferred their allegiances from the dead Rangers to the struggling not fully recognised Sevcco. One thing about Rangers right up To their death, they were totally involved in making decisions for Scottish Football
Yes dear P.S. Married life's been "productive" ER. On a topical note, we've been looking into "restructuring" and expect to extend the Pure league with an additional member in the next 8 weeks or so.
That's what happens, Trevor if you don't pay the milk man he won't consult you if he is Thinking of changing his daily round to delivering every other day. If you don't pay, you don't have a say.
