Fair enough mate. There will always be poor decisions in football. This will not change until we introduce video technology i.e. a ref who is sitting in the stands, behind 20 monitors who can analyse the incidents and make a decision and then relay that onto the on field referee. Once players realise that they won't get away with it, they will become more honest.
Can I just ask all fellow Liverpool fans to spare a thought, because whenever Suarez scores a farmers crop dries up and 1000 children die. Thanks.
From Mansfield's manager This man has more class than all the manu chelsea spurs and any other fake morality don't live by their own standards fans put together HIAG calls Suarez dishonest, but HIAG pretends to be a legal professional, Suarez dishonest ?
Leave your fake morality at home mate Have you ever lied? Have you ever done something you should not have? Yeah you have, so what the fkcu can you say about Suarez you fool?
lol at the reds manning their defensive positions looking to fire on anyone who dares have a pop at St Luis of Anfield. The man has a history of cheating, he's a past master, so therefore given the context of this latest incident i.e. a non league side in the FA Cup & they're denied by a goal that was blatantly hand ball by him - then the media / public interest is bound to be high. People saying he should have fessed up to the ref need to give their heads a wobble, as does Brenda if he thinks that it wasn't deliberate. The bottom line is that the referee & linesman missed a blatant hand ball, so it's their fault that the goal stood. However, reds shouldn't be surprised that Suarez is being questioned here, Ballotelli should maybe lend him his T shirt................
When we got the penalty against Man City in the Carling Cup semi-final because the ball hit a defender's hand after their knee everyone was screaming for the referee to take the distance and accidental nature into account. This time the referee did exactly that. And still they scream.
What the **** took you so long to post some bitter drivel? Thought you'd have at least made the effort to get on here sooner. Personally I think given Phil Nevilles history of diving he should be shot at dawn
I hope he scores one like that every week. The rage being displayed by opposition fans is quite amusing and Suarez should get an award for being the ultimate troll. Legend.
So Veg, we will all visit the Swans board after every match to see your comments vilifying every push, kick, pull, foul, stealing of yards at free kicks, exaggeration of injury, debating with a ref after a correct decision, owning up to every offside not called and you naming and shaming each Swansea player; Right? Don't make me laugh with your seemingly new found "integrity" because its amazing that you only come on and start the debate about a player not following the herd after Suarez. There has been plenty of dubious actions by many a player before this that have effected the result of a game. Where was your stand then? Ian Wright gets it spot on in 3 tweets @IanWright0: Suarez was not intentional, the way he finished made me think he thought it would be disallowed. But the officials missed it ! @IanWright0: Saw a Brighton player get foul, roll over twice, look up at the ref, then roll again! Gets a player sent off, then gets up. Not a word said. @IanWright0: But because it's Suarez ,and yes there is previous, but on this occasion , it was not intentional! #Suarezveryeasytarget He's right. I watched that game and was appalled when I saw the Brighton player roll & look up to see where the ref was and rolled again. Fairly sure if I go to the Brighton board for Saturday I'll not see you with your integrity there,or Tobes or the Mancs on to "debate" cheating. Why is that if its about football and not just about Liverpool & Suarez in particular? This tendency to witch hunt the selected villain (Suarez is not the first) lowers the credibility of UK opinion in world football. We look like a bunch of hick peasants with burning torches & pitch forks. In short we look unintelligent and xenophobic. With the hack journalists its born out of a lack of writing skill & laziness. Pick a player, make them the devil apply view to all events involving said player. That way they get paid to be a "a journalist" without actually having to work at it.
Best thing about it, is that Suarez really couldn't care less about people's opinions of him. Keeps playing, keeps scoring and keeps the hatred burning.
You accept that the flak that's coming Suarez way was expected and natural coming from the media and the other fans. I personally think he could have avoided handling the ball if he REALLY wanted to. I think most players in that position would not have stretched their arm to handle the ball. Suarez should have said to the referee it was a clear case of handball and I am sure he would have been given massive credit instead of being villified. Now he has reinforced his image as an evil cheat. The reality is that he could have changed people's perception of him in an instant. Mansfield had a lot of respect for Liverpool (they had a tribute organised, it was the biggest day in their history) now they feel cheated of a lucrative replay.
As soon as the ball hit Suarez on the arm, his arm flew back. So he either tried to pull it away do it wasn't a hand ball or the unexpected hit from the ball hit his arm backwards.
"This tendency to witch hunt the selected villain (Suarez is not the first) lowers the credibility of UK opinion in world football. We look like a bunch of hick peasants with burning torches & pitch forks. In short we look unintelligent and xenophobic." A cloned army of Christian Smiths. Been mentioned before the irony that since the Evra witchtrial Suarez has become the whipping-boy for moralists of good behaviour racial tolerance, him being the unapologetic greasy dago. Can't wait to read Samuel's latest vomit on it.
Not one striker playing or ex that has commented agrees with you so either Suarez is just another striker or you don't know what you're talking about? Your second mistake is believing that Suarez cares what media hacks & wums like you think about him. Because if he doesn't care then he'll feel no need "to change your perception of him" will he? Publicly Mansfields boss and several players have said that they accept yesterday and would have took a result in exactly the same way so you're obviously just projecting feelings of outrage......again. You are also falling into that rather basic trap of just changing one event in match and saying the match result would have been 1-1. If we're going to the land of "what if" I can just as easily say, goal disallowed but Suarez goes on in the new back to the future timeline and scores a hatrick; it makes about as much sense as your make believe draw. "Evil" really? This is why you sound like a hysterical girl. Hitler, Pol Pot, Genocide, famine in the modern world; these things are evil. An overpaid man kicking or in this case handling a bag of air legally or illegally according to rules of this form of mass entertainment is not evil. You've obviously lead a very sheltered life if you truly believe so.
You're right about the Brighton player, what he did was snide & he conned the ref. But it was a Brighton player, one most of us will have barely of heard of, so we don't know it he's got 'history' in that department. As opposed to Suarez who has become a bit of a pantomine villan in recent months, but of his own making. He's viewed as a diving snide, because of his own actions, the fact that he's a high profile, quality footballer ensures that any incident of this kind of nature involving him, will make headlines & attract more interest & comment, than some lad from Brighton. That surely can't come as a surprise?
