He said they chose Giroud over Ba. If we went for Ba before Chelsea, we would've had him. Chelsea were the only big team that triggered his clause.
And that makes him comparable to a player like Ba? Are you seriously that stupid? Just to prove your ******ation, why should we sign a new DMF who can intercept and defend from midfield? Erm, Denilson can already intercept and tackle from midfield, and so can Coqualan, so who needs another quality DMF in the names that are being mentioned? That's the essence of your argument, Ba scores, so what, but Chamakh and Kieran Dyer score too....You are such a f--king idiot my man.
Why? Chelsea are better than us and pay their top players more money. Why would he have picked Arsenal over Chelsea?
I'm saying we could've went for him before Chelsea showed any interest. Chelsea only showed interest now and triggered the clause and got him. If we get another quality striker, I won't mind. But thing is with Arsenal, I'm sure we will settle for a lower quality player such as Adrian Lopez.
I'm not comparing him to Ba, you are. I'm saying that like Ba, RVP etc you will whinge about it endlessly. The point was that you said it was over one goal that Chamakh might score today. Then I told you that Chamakh scored twice when he last played for us. Only a mentally ******ed buffoon would have not understood that
You're the ****ing idiot who brought Chamakh up in the first place, the fact you even brought him up, shows it's you who's the ******ed buffoon. Who gives a **** if Chamakh scored 2 or 3 goals in our last game? My godddddddddd.
How do you know that? They could have been working on getting him in the background for ages. Then once the window they snapped him up. Chelsea have our beating in a race to sign players.
Oh how low, you now have to resort to lying? My friend, your posts are there for everybody to see. Where you made the stupid argument that Kieran Dyer scored today, and if Chamakh scores, will I be complaining too. The fact you see it like that, proves your a ****** and think there's a corelation or comparison between the two. In your thick head, Ba scoring is comparable to Chamakh and Dyer scoring, don't resort to lying because you realise what a ****ing idiot you're going to look like. Just like you did when you asked if we missed RVP, LOL. No, we don't miss RVP at all.
So does that mean you're not going to whine like a bitch if Chamakh scores for West Ham ? That would be some relief at least
Haha at you, you're proving that you truly are the most delusional fan out there, Chamakh and Ba scoring is the same thing for you.
Seeing as you missed the irony of those posts, I can only assume that you must be a mentally ******ed buffoon
There was no irony in those posts, you weren't trying to be ironical at all. There is no irony in comparing Ba's goals to Chamakh or Dyer. You're the ****** not me, you prove you're a BIGGER ****** NOW since you don't even know how to use irony in it's proper manner.
Seeing as you are acting like a mentally ******ed buffoon, I'll spell it out for you: I'm not comparing Ba with Dyer, Chamakh, RVP or any other player. I'm taking the piss out of you because every time a player scores who's either played for us, or is linked with us, or you read some bullshit gossip that we're going to sign him, and he scores for another team You whinge endlessly like an old woman about how our club have let them slip through the net. If you can't see the irony in my posts, then you must be even more of a ******ed buffoon than I first thought
Anyway, enough of players who don't play for us and what they might be doing if they did. It's a pointless discussion. let's get back to the game in hand