Already played for 2 clubs on long term deals this season (Southampton permanent contract, Forest half-season loan) so we couldn't sign him on a permanent deal or on a loan to the end of the season. We could sign him on an emergency loan or 3, but you'd be looking at a maximum of 93 days, maybe extendable to about 103 or 104 through clever use of breaks in the loan. The problem there would be that after 28 days he would be on a 24 hour recall.
Hull City set to make a loan move for Carlos Bacca until the end of the season, Caros Bacca dreams of transfer in January but whether City get him is a diffrent story.
Club Brugge player, Bacca was acquired by Club Brugge in Belgium in the January 2012 Transfer window. Bruges paid 1.5 million euros (£1.2m) for his service, now valued at £3.4 scored 20 in 27 since joining
In my opinion we have to get someone who is experienced at this level and who we know will score goals instead of risking money and promotion on someone we don't know a lot about.
think you will find Club Brugge is far above this level http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_Brugge_K.V.
I dont get the point. He has 20 goals in 27 appearances. So why would they loan him to us again? A quick search on the net does say he wants to move leagues, but he wants to go to spain.
Its a different league though it could take time for him to adapt which is a risk. Why take that risk when we could get someone like Graham or Campbell who we know can score goals at this level
Again, as in you need to explain why they would loan him to us. As you say they are bigger than our league and he has 20 goals in 27 appearances. "again" used that way must be an american thing.
