Think Hypocrite is the word you're looking for hypocrite (1) A person who engages in the same behaviors he condemns others for.
Well no that's not true because if every team above you wins all of their next games then you won't go up(automatically)!
Added to ignore list. That is 2 on my list and a bigger pair of bores you couldnt find. Makes life happy - enourage one and all to do it, but this twat would still argue with himself
See, Charlies got it. It's not in Leicester's hands because they have to rely on teams above them. We do not.
True but not accurate Cardiff still have to play you and us Therefore if you are saying that we win 21 games then Cardiff can win a maximum of 20 games Boro also have to play us (as well as Cardiff and you) and also could win a maximum of 20 games You could win all 21 but it means cardiff and midlesborough lose matches Yes there is a scenario if Leicester win all 21 they still might not go up but your statement cannot be correct as it looks like you are assuming the Leicester win 21 games Seems like a schoolboy error
OH MY ****ING GOD. It's like debating with a ****ing child and i'm not going to bother any more. Starting to get quite pissed off. Every ****ing point gets argued, even when both sides of the argument are correct.
Despite having by far the busiest board on the Championship forum, you were the only person ever permanently banned from our board and you were given multiple warnings before that action was taken, to which your response was 'go on then, ****ing ban me'. You've been less of a twat since you were made a moderator, but you lack the common sense and balance to do the job properly, though it's not my board so you can obviously do what you like. The reason I know who to speak to if action needs to taken, is that I took my responsibilities seriously and made sure I knew what was required of me at all times, you obviously don't think that matters.
If the argument is whether it's in Leicester's hands the answer is simple, it isn't. You could win every game throughout the rest of this season, you'd be on 104 points. However, we could get 111 and Cardiff 110.
Listen child, you have asked us to post on one single thread, a mildly racist thread that you allowed to stay up, yet you're still ****ing moaning. You should have asked asked Santa for a sense of perspective, you soppy ****.
You continuously deleted a post of mine which had nothing in it that was wrong. It was all fact that proved my argument to be correct and you and your fellow Hull fans couldn't hack it. I remember it being around who was the better full back. Kyle Naughton (now starter for Spurs) or Liam Rosenoir (had to get a loan signing to replace him at Hull). I lack common sense? You mean I should start banning? Good advice. I take my responsibilities very seriously and am in constant contact with Proud and Fosse who would deal with anything like this. I would say he's higher up than I am and does a better job than I do. Which is why I voted for them to become moderators. I never asked to be moderator. I was voted in and in doing so I will continue to do what I feel is best for my fellow posters. Now, i'm coming off. The darts is just too incredible to be distracted by this immature and pathetic debate.
I did say there is a scenario where Leicester could win all 21 games and not go up. I was just pointing out a schoolboy error by Charlie
