FFP bites .. Malaga banned .. next chelsea & city

of course you're bitter, since Roman came along we've been just as successful as you and prevented you from winning even more. Fancy that, little old Chelsea! btw, how exactly are we not challenging for honours like 'you are'? we had a better season than you did last year.

as for your second paragraph, hmm, might want to check our last few transfers out.

 

it was being talked about a few years before that shwan, just wasn't called FFP.

 

am not obsessed by Chelsea .. but yes am obsessed by FFP for one reason bcz it is unfair
we worked more than 100 years to get where the club are now .... then we see Barca winning by piling up debts to pay those stupid wages and transfer fees, we see Real debt wiped out by king every time they are in debt , we see clubs like City or chelsea or PSG who get our targets an inflate the market
in the other hand you see clubs like Arsenal and others who do the right thing and struggling

 

hhh just like people were talking about end of the world at 21st of Dec
talked about is not the same as been passed by law .. UEFA talked about lots of stuffs not all them passed as a law
and i dare you to find any source which talked about FFP at 2003 when Abra bought Chelsea

 

Aye, when you won the CL and posted at £18 million profit on player sales IIRC. So all you need to do is win the CL and sell £20 million worth of players every season and you're laughing!

There's just one small problem with that strategy this season...

 

much more reasoned response, you're not just targeting us. forgetting your own club's abysmal debt though aren't you.

the principle 'financial fair play' was created in 09 but there were whispers of something along those lines before then.

 

hhh and it was a merely 1m profit after all that
chelsea will definitely be back in red this season just before FFP looking to the club account ... sweet

 

yep, those sponsors should do the trick

 

see what I mean, it's things like 'sweet' which make me say chelsea obsessed, further proof

 

All £45 million of it?

 

All £45 million of it?

 

that debt is not bcz we buy or pay wages more than we afford .. is bcz stupid owners bought the club .. and even with that we are still making profits that owners actually took 600m out of the club since they bought it .. in which planet that is relative?

PLS don't make me a laugh .. what whispers !!? i challenged you to bring me one link dated in 2003 talking about FFP

 

hhh have to admit i put that specially to tease you mate

 

All £45 million of them?

 

have to admit i put that specially to tease you

 

have to admit i put that specially to tease you

 

United with "Abysmal debt" are still bigger, more successful and in a better position than Chelsea "lets spend 500 million FC".

Its clear to see Roman is bricking it at FFP. That's why spending has stopped bar one last minute, CL win, fuelled splurge. That's why your squad is garbage outside the first 11 and you're so desperate to get all these dodgy sponsorship deals in.

You'll try plenty of weaseling but the days of you challenging for the PL are gone..... Unless you get a really great manager that is.... well provided Roman doesn't sack him first. For a man who's supposedly so smart on account of being a billionaire he sure acts stupid a lot of the time.

 

agree with all of that except our squad being dire outside the first 11.

 

So how much will the new sponsors bring in each season?

 

I'd imagine about 80 million maybe more. The Gazprom one will likely be 40-50m a season, our new kit deal is an extra 5 million a season, the whiskey one was rumoured to be 5-10milliona season, there was a 10million beer deal for sponsorship due to promotion and there are about 6 others that are worth a few million each