Ince and Sturridge

think he does, but can only look to loan deals as owners wont give enough funds to get a proper striker, which is why we keep getting ruddy potential ie cheap wages.

 

I see where you are coming from but I don't 100% agree. Although I tend to take the stance of 'you've made your bed, lay in it', I also respect that he wanted to play rather than collect a pay cheque.

As for whether it is a good signing or not, I guess only time will tell but it is not a deal I was exactly hoping for

I never expected a striker, been saying this for a few months now. With the way Brendan wants us to play we were never going to be in the market for a goal poacher IMO

 

Agree 100%

 

FFS

 

Only eighteen hours after I posted that comment, your getting quicker

 

Overslept. Christmas do last night at Gusto's in Kuntsford. It was sh1te

 

Your Turkey brewing nicely...?

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...on-verge-of-signing-new-contract-8426363.html


****ing agents

 

Interesting. what would people prefer if we could only see one happen...


1) Sign Sturridge

or

2) Sterling sing a new contract.


I suspect I know the answer here and I think it will be a landslide too

 

I'd go for 2) personally

 

Fixed

 

Personally I'd rather he stopped singing and signed a new contract instead

 

Nicely done sir

 

There are about five threads for this fu<king bollocks now. Fu<k. There's one for bollocks (or lack of them) too

 

Would rather Sterling signed, but I still think we'll get Sturridge

 

.

 

I think we'll see both too

 

Both are happening

 

Awesome innit

 

Wouldn't mind us signing Sturridge and missing out on Ince, personally