Right, last post He'll be a better dad when he's 33. Jen mentioned that people having kids over 35 were nutters - my argument is relative. I had kids young and there is nothing wrong with them. However, I can provide better for my toddler and she's got a better chance in life than my eldest two. It's a relative argument. Parents can be good parents when they're 20 - I'm not suggesting otherwise. However, they will be better parents when they're 30.
We had my first when I was 21 and she was 19. In my opinion, age is irrelevant to this whole debate. You could grow to be old and bitter, you may mature like a fine bottle of red. I was certainly more energetic with my oldest, beating her almost daily but with my son I can barely be arsed stubbing a *** out on his arm these days.
41, been with me bird for 21 years apart from a year or so apart, she doesn't want to marry or have kids. I'm not fussed.
I must admit I didn't even read the op but this thread is obviously Easter1980 coming out. Bit late now old man you've kept it quiet nigh on 80 years
Bib surely your a better parent to the 3rd brat because you had practice before the 3rd whereas with the first it was all new? Ive got a 16 year old daughter and a boy thats 12 the mora none of them were planned, i dont think it matters what age you are when you have them, some folk are just **** at handling it while others take to it easier
