Tina calls people orange bastards = banter / tongue in cheek. MD calls weeble a beed rattler = ****ing appalling. The logic of Dev
MTS calls MD a ***** = not even a mention MD even mentions Jim Torbett = Sickening and disgusting. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=rangers found guilty of cheating
Rangers got no advantage from buying players instead of paying tax. Willis, the one man intellectual cul-de-sac.
Between the pair of you neither of you could summon a credible, definite source which claims rangers cheated to gain an unfair advantage. You have no proof of rangers cheating, therefore you have no argument base.
So there is no proof of Rangers cheating other than the fact that they cheated. Careful now Willis, you might shake my absolute faith in my argument with your incisive and insightful posting.....Oh no, wait a minute. You are an idiot
There may be proof, but you sure as **** don't own any of it. And all the proof in the world has still not found us instantly guilty as you have, you talk ****e, your arguments ****e, you have no proof, you have nothing from the SPL or SFA stating we cheated. Remember to goto your hole before the sun comes up, we wouldn't want anything brightening up your day you miserable ****
Is 54 tainted titles not proof you've cheated over the years , I 've just returned from Arbroath one of the worst games I've ever seen in over 35 years of watching us , the cold , the ground everything never been so depressed at a game , if Rangers win the league (if) you move up to mighty high level of scot div 2 . How you thick idiots can enjoy watching games like that is unbelivable , but you've never understood the great game of football .
It is as clear as day. and ALREADY In the public domain you ****ing dopey ****. What do you think this means? The Tribunal attempted in its exercise of fixing these matters on the scale of offences to identify a more serious offence than those on the complaints, and concluded that only match fixing in its various forms might be a more serious breach. Do you think that mean Rangers behaved well? How about this? In the case of the non payment of tax (which was possibly by the smallest margin the most serious breach) the massive extent of the failure and the intentional and calculated manner in which it was carried out aggravated the breach even further.” The panel identified £13 million deducted from player wages for PAYE and N.I ....What was that £13m used for?? Even someone as monumentally stupid as you can work out that this money went towards paying players wages and other bills. So quite obviously Rangers gained a sporting advantage from this course of action. Quite obviously they cheated and quite obviously the SFA panel that already returned its verdict 6 ****ing months ago agree. So once again Willis, you aren't smart enough to talk about these matters so perhaps it might be an idea to keep your ignorant ass shut
Ah come on now. They don't actually believe that ****. They just say it because they think it annoys Timmy.
<yawn> I never read any of that. Until you provide me a link to a statement from the SFA or SPL saying rangers are guilty of cheating everything you say is just the ramblings of a bigoted spastic. Then again you were right about rangers cheating the taxman, so I have no reason not to believe you please log in to view this image
Bigoted Spastic? That is extremely ironic coming from you. I was right about Rangers cheating the tax man. Maybe you didn't hear. Just like I was right about Rangers liquidating, Just like I was right about you dumb ****s starting a new club and pretending it is the same thing. Painfully obvious. Just like your stupidity. Anyway, Seeing as you think you are a smart man today perhaps you'll accept a bet? When I prove that either the SFA or SPL deem non payment of taxes to be an unfair sporting advantage, you will issue me with a full apology and then **** off the site for a month?
I see your stupid ****ing bet and raise you a sensible one. When the outcome of the SPL Commission is finished I will admit I'm wrong if: Rangers are found guilty (Baring in mind I don't actually mind admitting I'm wrong as opposed to you) But if rangers are found to have not broken the rules (and no being ****ing taiggy over this we are either guilty and get punished or innocent and not punished, no ****ing down syndrome excuses) You will admit you were wrong. Either accept that or not because I have no ****ing interest in what you think you can prove, your opinion on the matter has no ****ing bearing on rangers what so ever. In fact you even thinking you mean anything towards the result of the case just shows how ****ing big your over sized ego is. I'm away to bed, you can accept or **** off as far as I'm concerned.
We are talking about two different things here you spazzy ****wit but seeing as you have seen my bet, I guess that means you accept it. We can talk about the other bet when you get back in a month http://www.scotprem.com/content/default.asp?page=s109 "To turn a blind eye, to allow clubs to continually fail to make prompt payments as they fall due, would be to allow those clubs to gain an unfair sporting advantage over all those other clubs that pay their players, the taxman and other clubs on time. That is one of the reasons why, whenever the SPL receives a request from players to adjudicate on their contracts, it has a duty to do so." Neil Doncaster Chief Executive, Scottish Premier League Cheerio you dopey ***** please log in to view this image
So nothing in there that says rangers are guilty. It's also a blog, much like RTC was a blog. What a ****ing lunatic you are. I think you need to learn the rules of betting, if I raise you you must see my bet, daft ****. Rangers have not been proven to have cheated, until you show me a statement from the commission saying rangers have cheated, you lose. By the way I believe you have just forced a 2 chip penalty upon yourself By the way nice touch on trying to blame me for changing the subject, I've said the same thing over the past 3 pages
