Why ? IMO, only if they get anymore midfielders out injured will Meyler go back. But it would not surprise if the Mackems had told Bruce that he could stay but with a 48hrs re-call clause. I forgot that they had James McFaddon signed up and he sat on the bench @ Norwich. Also, Steve Bruce has told Burnsy (on last nights sportstalk) that nothinbg has yet been heard from MON on Meyler about a re-call..
They don't need to recall meyler as looking at them on motd they have at worse problems than cattermole being out.
So it appears as i posted earlier. For once Bull sh.it Man posts something correct. Sunderland need far more than the return of Meyler. Rumours have it that MON will sign John Guedetti(striker) on loan from Man City in January.
Indeed. Ugly women and a chip on their shoulder about Newcastle are their biggest problem. Anyway Chezzy can play CB and CM without breaking sweat.
They haven't yet, it does suggest that they might in the Sky report. Meyler was kept out of the side by Cattermole, they may have other midfielders that could do a job, but if you have a midfielder out on loan that is very similar in style to one who is now out injured, then I don't see why they wouldn't recall him. I don't dispute Sunderland look gash, why make matters worse by leaving players out on loan that would improve your starting 11?
I don't get your reasoning. Are you saying it's like someone not being worried about having a hair lip because they also have a hunch back? (Sorry OLM - nothing personal)
