If it is all the same, I think I'll maybe take a rain check on that, to be honest it sounds pretty pish to me.
You do the bit in the brackets first ffs, so it's 288. please log in to view this image None of you ****s learn BODMAS at school?
Get him one of these (£11.74 on Amazon) and trouser the remaining £238.26. please log in to view this image It's a win-win situation.
It's not ambiguous to me. 48/2(9+3), you add 9 and 3 first because they are in the brackets, hence 12, then you divide by 48 by 2, hence 24, then multiply 12 by 24 = 288. BODMAS!!!!
I thought in mathematical notation you needed a dot operator in there. In any case, I'm coming at it from a programming angle and any language I've coded in you need an *
Well,if you bothered to read one of my many other interesting posts, the one stating that the 48 could be the numerator and the 2(9+3) could be the denominator, it would be ****ing ambiguous!
I know **** all about programming, but the BODMAS/BOMDAS maths lessons stick in my head for some reason. I'm sorry but I cannot respond to the above post as I did not read it.
Hahaha cheeky ****! In other words I win! On another note, you know that bot thing mrroy59 or whatever it was, I don't think even Edge could pull that off, any chance of deleting/banning it, it did my **** in today.
I was never taught BODMAS, but I still remember the SOH-CAH-TOA mnemonic for the formulae for right-angled triangles. Shame I haven't had to use it since the 80s.