We average 77 long balls every game, the most in the league and 10 more than Stoke's 67 average who are 2nd in the "long ball table".
More unpleasant reading...
More unpleasant reading...
****ing disgusting. When you factor in that we don't have a traditional long ball centre forward it is even more amazing/depressing, just giving the gift of possession to the opposition.
I hate play hoofball. And whats even worse about it is that its normally Williamson who's booting it forward, and he can't pass for ****e. But i do think we play more long balls because our midfield are doing nothing to come to the defence and get the ball. I'm blaming our formation if we played 4-2-3-1/4-3-3 we would have two deep lying midfielders and there job should be to get the ball of the defence before Mike thinks hes David Beckham and hits a 40 yard pass to there left back.
Yeah we're so much better in a 4-2-3-1 because it also benefits Tiote, it means he has some help in there so he doesn't have to pick up as many bookings for desperate tackles to prevent breakaways etc.[/B]
Yeah we're so much better in a 4-2-3-1 because it also benefits Tiote, it means he has some help in there so he doesn't have to pick up as many bookings for desperate tackles to prevent breakaways etc.
I really feel for cisse this season outsiders will look at it and think he's flopped. But we actually create nothing for him all I can remember is the half chance he had at Everton away. We've got some of the most gifted players I've seen at Newcastle for a long time and were not using them right surely ? It's such a waste
Did we create much last season though? I'm fairly sure we were very low on chance creation last season as well, we just had strikers who had massively high chance conversion!
How many long balls can be squeezed in to 8 years then?