"There is no statistical proof that Fergie time applies specifically to Man Utd. But the statistics do show a bias towards big teams. Perhaps we should call it "Mancini time" or "Wenger time"? Or even "Benitez time" (or insert name of whoever is managing Chelsea at time of reading)?" Pretty much what Utd fans have been pointing out for the past two decades. Thanks for agreeing with us
i didn't realise extra time was only added on for Manchester United to score that winning goal...... i fort both teams could score stupid me
It says only the 4 or 5 big clubs benefit from added seconds in extra time. So it seems that the title-less scousers do not benefit from any extra added time
hhh Chelsea games end before us when winning .. waw so in same logic refs really are helping Chelsea then? .. what an idiot why UTD get more times (if true) - teams tend to waste time more against us bcz we are club no.1 overall - we score more goals especially by 2nd half .. so sure there must be more time added on for each goal
hhh the article is suggesting chelsea are getting less time than UTD when they are infront to wrap up the victory... either he didn't bothered to read and he is the type of people who just read the titles .. or simply he can't understand English
