1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Maybe the Allams should have done the same.

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by HC, May 4, 2011.

  1. HC

    HC Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    27
    #1
  2. Boogie-Dave

    Boogie-Dave Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    1
    Honesty comes to mind!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
    #2
  3. Sagegee

    Sagegee Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Reading that story I came to the conclusion, that they have tied themselves in so many lies, that sooner or later the Fraud Squad will need to take a "serious" look into the dodgy dealings of these (ahem??) "gentlemen"!!

    If it looks like a pile of ****e, smells like a pile of ****e............................., then it probably is the biggest pile of ****e they have come out with, in all the Monaco-based owners, via Nevis in the West Indies, lifetime !!!!!
     
    #3
  4. Jerel Ifil

    Jerel Ifil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    9,460
    Likes Received:
    119
    It's dodgy-looking, but Bates will have made sure everything under the previous regime was legit. Not sure the Football League will be bothered about investigating past owners of Leeds and they've already deemed Bates fit and proper to run our club, so I guess that's that. You can find my thoughts on the evil one's takeover on the Leeds board.

    If the Allams did the same as Bates, mind, they'd first have to undergo the point deduction, then sell the club to a faceless organization which they effectively still run from behind the scenes and then sell it back to themselves again. It would be an awful lot of hassle and all very unscrupulous stuff.
     
    #4
  5. HC

    HC Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    27
    I'd take a 10 point penalty and a bit of hassle to save £40 million if it was all deemed legal and ethical/moral. I don't think it can be though, I can't even see how it can be legal. Bates remained the Chairman and ran the club the whole time didn't he, how can that be allowed?
     
    #5
  6. Jerel Ifil

    Jerel Ifil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    9,460
    Likes Received:
    119
    He remained Chairman, which is completely allowed, but wasn't the owner. The owner was Leeds City Holdings, run by the Forward Sports Fund, which was in turn run by a variety of trusts and shareholders. No-one publicly knows who those trusts and shareholders were except the Football League, who are confident it wasn't Bates. Hence the faceless puppet organization I mentioned in my previous post. It's possible within the rules to sell a club to such an organization then buy it back again. That's what Ken did, he's bought a majority shareholding in Forward Sports Fund, so he now administers Leeds City Holdings, and by implication Leeds United FC.

    Not sure about Hull's takeover or whether they could have done the same. One thing's for sure: if Allam had taken over Hull City, put them into administration, incurred a 10 point deduction and sold it to a faceless organization who he can't legally reveal is puppet-run by him, then it was revealed that the organization sold the club back to him, he'd have all sorts of **** thrown in his direction by Hull fans, the press and the Government's sports committee. It would look a lot more blatant than what Bates has done and he's had enough grief from those groups.
     
    #6
  7. Siegfried's cat

    Siegfried's cat Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    71
    If you read the programme for the Palace game you will see that in Adam Pearson's notes he says that the Allam's auditors said that administration wasn't an option as the club had no assets and the only option would be liquidation of the club.

    Yes, he may be talking **** to make the Allam's option sound better, but I for one have no reason to doubt him as he is the one with intimate knowledge of the clubs finances and a fair amount of financial sense.
     
    #7
  8. hullborn

    hullborn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    Messages:
    3,847
    Likes Received:
    2,380
    i know its easy to say as its not my money... but im happy the allams came in and paid off our debt 'properly'. we've had enough dodgy dealings going on in the past to last us a lifetime. finally some good honest people come in with good intentions at heart and save our club. i wouldnt want it done any other way but properly & honestly.
     
    #8
  9. H-D

    H-D Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    We'll see what the Premier League make of it if, God forbid, they were to go up. All ownership issues have to be discolsed in the PL, which means Mr. Bates will have to come out and state the facts <ok>
     
    #9
  10. Jerel Ifil

    Jerel Ifil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    9,460
    Likes Received:
    119
    All present ownership issues would have to be disclosed. And they already have been here.
     
    #10

  11. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,649
    Likes Received:
    75,964
    I don't think Bates now has any issues with the Premier League, he is now the declared owner.

    His problem may come if any of the old creditors decide to come after him, he's obviously on very dodgy ground.
     
    #11

Share This Page