well the last time we beat you you were winning by TWICE as many goals .and it still finished 5 - 2 And you had 11 men then too. next excuse please.
Let's just suffice to say that what might have happened is conjecture. What DID happen is that Adebayor stupidly got himself sent off early in the first half. That killed the game as a contest.
You are suggesting that its a given that because you were winning when dumbass was sent off , you would have gone on to win . It dont work that way does it. It didnt last year , and it wouldnt have this year. BUT it gives you all a nicely packaged excuse for the defeat so , enjoy .
He took his time because Wilshere amongst other Spurs and Arsenal players were kicking off. It was nothing to do with being bitter about losing, I've been perfectly amiable to other Arsenal users and indeed you until you started acting like a wum. If you put away all your chances you'd be the best team in the World ever, it's a fairly mute point. Personally I don't bemoan us missing chances I criticise the players for not doing well enough when they miss a good opportunity. You couldn't put the game beyond our 10 men until we were well and truly knackered and for that I think our team deserves praise for giving it everything in that second half despite being up against it.
Saying that your responses were bitter is not wumming mate Blaming the ref for a 5-2 defeat is somewhat disingenuous, especially when Webb got the sending off spot on.
Yes it is, I replied to you respectfully simply telling you to "behave" as I didn't believe you could miss what I was saying so badly and you offered me a pint of bitter as a sarcy dig. Seriously are you going to continue to drag this out or take my suggestion? You've said you don't mind the language so all you're annoyed about is that I see your bitter comment as wumming, you don't have a leg to stand on trying to say it's not can you not see that?
So if when we play you at WHL later this season it's 1 all and one of your players gets sent off and we go on to win then that has nothing to do with the result as we would have won anyway?
I won't slate AVB just yet, but if Adebayor acts like a complete dickhead again, I will. AVB has got to lay into him for that stupid challenge, so early in the game. Ade cost us this game, today, and AVB will cost us our season, if he lets him continue to act like a dickhead.
YV, I was banned from the Gooner board for behaving no where near as badly as PESKIE does on this board. I'm not advocating a permanent ban, but an indefinite one is certainly called for, I believe. Surely, we've put up with his juvenile stupidity for long enough? He never has anything constructive to say. The best wums can, in their jesting, make good and pertinent arguments; but PESKIE is nothing more than a very bad wum, and nasty with it, too. I really don't know why you mods put up with it. Yes, you have a reputation for being tolerant - and very deserved it is, too - but PESKIE abuses your tolerance every time he comes onto this board and opens his stupid mouth.
Ok. But what if AVB is hard on Abebayor and he still does it again? You can't always blame the masher for the players stupidity.
Although technically a legit red card, it was harsh and I think some of you guys are being equally harsh on Ade. HIAG, you are in danger of becoming as bitter as YV. Peskie is doing what fans do from both sides after a derby or big game. That said, I wouldn't mind having him banned from the Arsenal board
PM us if you want to discuss anyone you want banned. No I don't think banning Piskie is necessarry, even if we did he's create another account and post. He's welcome to do it on his own board. We ask that rival fans come one here and don't wum, he can say what he wants on his own board. I've not seen another mod ever come on our board wumming striaght after a victory but Piskie has done it several times.
If requests for bans are done behind closed doors, how will I get a ground-swell of popular opinion for banning PESKIE? That's the kind of tactic that PESKIE would use - sneaky, behind-your-back, and double-faced. That isn't my style. Besides, what's the point in PM'ing you about banning PESKIE if you clearly are not going to do it? Seems a bit pointless, to me.
Because HAIG the mods make joint decisions on such matters and therefore PM's are needed for such a discussion to begin.
It is my opinion that PESKIE should be banned. I express it openly, but without the slightest hope that he will be banned. There seems to be one rule for mods and another for rank-and-file, which seems grossly unfair to me. But, perhaps I am being naive?
