1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Sky Sports say that GFH don't have enough cash to complete.

Discussion in 'Leeds United' started by jasonwilcoxsrightfoot, Nov 14, 2012.

  1. jasonwilcoxsrightfoot

    jasonwilcoxsrightfoot Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    37
    No link yet...just verbal speculation. :emoticon-0101-sadsm
     
    #1
  2. BoggersMOT

    BoggersMOT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    892
    Might explain why its taking so long. DD was a fairly straightforward task, even for us. Confirming the funds & then transferring them is a whole different ball game. Its like buying a house. Its one thing to agree the price & get a survey (DD in the case of footy) done. Its another thing entirely to complete on the sale because the required amount actually has to be in your account.
     
    #2
  3. jasonwilcoxsrightfoot

    jasonwilcoxsrightfoot Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    37
    The question I keep coming back to is that surely at the very beginning of negotiations, GFH must have had to demonstrate to Bates that they had $50m in the bank? Otherwise why would be have spoken to them at all and for so long? Unless they spun him a yarn, but surely even Papa Smurf wouldn't fall for that???
     
    #3
  4. jasonwilcoxsrightfoot

    jasonwilcoxsrightfoot Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    37
    Sorry £ not $
     
    #4
  5. BoggersMOT

    BoggersMOT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    892
    Fair point JW, but I've seen people with bank accounts showing plenty of money to me, but then it mysteriously disappears after they theink they've made their case. No hint that this is what happened & they are even more iffy than Papa Smurf. But at least we can trust him to hang onto the reins until such time as we can all agree that funds are there and can/will/have been deposited. As I say, things could be worse. Imagine being a Glasgow Rangers, Portsmouth or similar supporter knowing that your whole future is in doubt.
     
    #5
  6. Chippy / Glory

    Chippy / Glory Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Messages:
    47,417
    Likes Received:
    12,662
    It is all irrelevent.

    No way is cuddly Ken selling before the chelski game. The American is going to offer more cash then GFH and the saudis are going to get their offer on the table the second GFH's exclusivity deal ends. I understand thet the exclusive period ends on 15/11/12. Ken gets more dosh, we get proper rich owners with the club not leveraged to buy it. The only downside is that this season is now a write off as far as promotion is concerned.
     
    #6
  7. MIGHTY

    MIGHTY Del-Boy

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,056
    Likes Received:
    6,311
    things could be worse. Imagine being a Glasgow Rangers, Portsmouth or similar supporter knowing that your whole future is in doubt.

    Boggers

    No takeover by the end of the season.
    No financial backers investing
    No big name players to sell off apart from McCormack
    season ticket sales down
    attendances down
    A chairman not willing to invest his own money

    How safe do you feel ?
     
    #7
  8. Doc

    Doc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    20,311
    Likes Received:
    27,960
    Makes a lot of sense really, because if you remember GFH were brokering the deal and then the original buyers pulled out for a couple of reasons. GFH then opted to do it by themselves and extended the exclusivity with Bates. Originally Bates would have insisted on proof of funds which would be lodged in a bank of his choosing, and once he had confirmation would then agree exclusivity. It would seem that GFH have been looking to bring in other investors, but have failed and can't afford it on their own. A fooking big waste of time, and yet Bates has had £2m from them, silly bastards.

    Square 1 again but needs to be quick as we'll be in administration before too long, and Bates will lose the club on the cheap to a shrewd investor who gets it for a song and not the £40+m Bates was hoping for. Another season wasted then and maybe even relegation again
     
    #8
  9. bucks_is_leeds

    bucks_is_leeds Jonny big spuds
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    10,557
    Likes Received:
    7,264
    Thing is Boggers, I really dont think we are that far away from being one of those said clubs! Luckly the brand have investors sniffing around, but we all know what a hassle reviewing the books are!
     
    #9
  10. MIGHTY

    MIGHTY Del-Boy

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,056
    Likes Received:
    6,311
    Top my list off with,,,

    The possibility of league 1 football
    No assets (E.R. or T.A.)
     
    #10

  11. MarkoLUFC

    MarkoLUFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    133
    The club owes GFHC £2 million with no means to pay it. That's more money out of the transfer budget. The amount of money spent on building those horrible useless corporate facilities keeps going up and up and up and has no signs of stopping, yet another loan taken out against the income of those facilities. Last count was £17 million in debt.

    I think it's safe to say our future IS in doubt, especially now it's more likely that bates will remain in charge through the January transfer window.
     
    #11
  12. Eireleeds1

    Eireleeds1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    31,894
    Likes Received:
    32,933
    Good news I say. Sooner GFH are out of the picture the better, maybe as soon as next week, then the proper money guys from Saudi, as reported by Yorkshire Post, will be able to formalise their bid. GFH have had ample time to get their cash together and apparently failed. In recent weeks they have looked like amateurs I'm afraid
     
    #12
  13. ristac

    ristac Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    28,254
    Likes Received:
    32,829
    I said a while back I don't believe GFH have a pot to piss in, no way would it be taking this long else. As for proof of funds, GFH gave Ken £2M I dare say this doesn't have to be repaid should they not stump up the cash.
     
    #13
  14. wasper

    wasper Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2011
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    160
    ik just hope that Bates is not GFH.
     
    #14
  15. Chippy / Glory

    Chippy / Glory Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Messages:
    47,417
    Likes Received:
    12,662

    He is GFH. Greedy ****ing Hasbeen
     
    #15
  16. BoggersMOT

    BoggersMOT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    Messages:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    892
    as houses Mighty, as houses
     
    #16
  17. 666 & Elmo

    666 & Elmo New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,054
    Likes Received:
    324
    ...in the current property market
     
    #17
  18. Millwallsteve

    Millwallsteve Waterloo's Finest
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    19,403
    Likes Received:
    1,583
    Jesus <yikes> how bad do things have to get then <laugh>
     
    #18
  19. MIGHTY

    MIGHTY Del-Boy

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24,056
    Likes Received:
    6,311
    Yep i know what you mean boggers <ok>

    please log in to view this image
     
    #19
  20. Infidel

    Infidel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    5,487
    Likes Received:
    6,762
    So Mighty, i see that they have started smartening Bermandsey up <laugh>
     
    #20

Share This Page