1. Nobody! Unlike Flyer I am consistent in saying that is a maybe, possibility etc. My post 39 explains in detail but i'm pointing out that we don't know everything that goes on unlike TF. He must take into account all facts. 2. He seems to have done ok so far and the outcome is not yet known. He MAY stick to his guns and prove to be right. 3. We may not come back up but if the scenario is correct we would still have a club that could be rescued. 4. Exactly my point, nail on the head, hole in one, you got it!!!! Because he walks we wouldn't have to pay the compensation that we do if we sack him. A new manager can rebuild from a better position than a club in administration in freefall like Portsmouth. I don't know the answer and don't know if it's even near right and none of us on here do. We have a board of directors and a chairman to look at all things QPR not just what we see on a weekly basis on the pitch.
Think your just being stubborn now Flyer. If that scenario were correct you'd risk the club altogether??? Seriously, you've lost the plot then but I rather think you just don't want to give any ground. In answer to your poll point the last I saw said 66% say sack so it's a majority but not the near everyone you portray. Thats called a fact and not a figure plucked from air.
Have you actually read the threads - vast majority (really vast majority) for a win. Wanting Rs to win does not mean wanting Hughes in perpetuity, it just means the vast majority of us could not turn up and hope for a loss because we are not built that way.
Why would sacking Hughes risk the club, and if that's the case then not only is a fu#kwitt our manager but also our owner! Nobody is bigger than the club, by your suggestions Mark Hughes is!
Are you seriously not reading my posts??!! I don't think I can be any clearer. I DO NOT KNOW and im not saying it will but the point I'm making is that TF, unlike you, Flyer or I will be aware of ALL SCENARIO's taking account of ALL INFORMATION. Whilst it may seem logical to get rid there MAY be valid reasons not to and I am SUGGESTING one such reason to explain that. As such I'll leave TF to get on with those decisions whilst I focus on supporting the team (that doesn't have to mean MH) but I won't boo as I think that adds more pressure to the players.
If any success we have on the field, due to a change in fortunes, still results in a guaranteed relegation because the fans aren't behind the manager then we're as bad as Blackburn fans last year. That wouldn't be Hughes fault, that would be ours.
Bit harsh to suggest that flyer has lost the plot then really. And im suggesting THAT if you're SUGGESTING that there may be REASONS why HE can't be sacked THEN tony has given the life or DEATH of qpr to MARK Hughes!!!!!
I'm just taking that statement to it's logical conclusion. Wins won't save us because of the fans - what's wrong with that picture?!?
I asked if in theory he would gamble the clubs future existence and he said yes so I'd stick by it. And it's not the life or death of qpr, in my scenario he has placed all his eggs in one basket with our premiership survival.
Baring up mate, went to see her over the weekend, waiting to hear more news. Re this thread it's like what's been said elsewhere same as what I'm hearing from various people Hughes is a gonna, I suspect we will hear something on Sunday, It's just a shame we can't do him under the trades description act
So you are saying that the club isnt at risk if we go down under Hughes but is if we go down under someone else?
I said Id gamble the future on a new man rather than guarantee no future with the current man. Can you not see the logic in that? Youd rather the club go out of business with Hughes than try and hope another manager keeps us up?
I dont know in all honesty but there have been various articles about the dire situation we would find ourselves in if the unthinkable happened. If you add in the purported £15 million it will cost to get rid of him then that could be enough to tip us over the edge. It is entirely supposition and no way of knowing if it could be right. From everything he's done so far I trust TF to make the right decision knowing the actual facts.
£15m wont be the difference, it will be the £70m per year lost in TV money. TF is a good business man but he doesnt know a lot about football, the fact that top level people wanted Hughes gone weeks ago and TF ignored them proves that correct to me.
There is no certainty that Hughes will be sacked if we lose on Saturday.. It would be a massive turn around by TF Anyway....Rangers will win emphatically against the Saints which means the Taffia is going nowhere fast.
