Like 90% ofthe threads on the entire website then Were you happy with a point at our place the other night? I'll take it because at the moment it's go to be about not losing - the whole bloody league bunched up again as usual!
Or, according to your argument, we're claiming offence, therefore the validity of such claims is automatically accepted, regardless.
You've spent the whole thread arguing against that position. So you can have no qualms with his right to call you the 'Cock Army'
I've had a PM from a male chicken that finds it offensive, so it should be banned, regardless of the intent of the user. I'm sure that you can't find any problems with this logic.
It should be noted that we have a very large cock on top of of our stadium and we are very proud of it. When the new stadium is built it will placed on the concourse so that the public may touch it and observe it at close quarters. The rumours that KFC will be the caterers are cock and bull
I'm sorry, but as per your argument, Mr Cock's claim is nullified on the basis that the intent behind the chant 'Cock Army' was not meant to offend. Perhaps you could encourage Mr Cock to write to the Society of Farm Animal Lawyers who can raise his case, only for it to be ridiculed on the basis that he is only interested in self publicity
IF Mr Cock chose to write to The Society of Farm Animal Lawyers and complain, then possibly they might have an axe to grind. To my knowledge, no Jewish person has written to Mr Nosey Herbert at The Society of Black Lawyers to make any complaint. As the vast majority of Jews are not black, why would they?
Mr Herbert claims that the Jewish people he has consulted with do have complaints about the continuing use of the chants at White Hart Lane.
He also claimed that Mark Clattenburg had racial abused Mikel, despite not being at the game, not watching the game, not watching the highlights of the game or the player himself actually hearing it.
