If I did, maybe. Possibly, but given it's not racist probably not. But if I quoted someone calling someone else a choc ice, I would definitely not be sacked. You're a ****ing half wit.
You're trying to imply United players are as bad as Terry which is simply not the case. You had to list the worst things four players had done to even get close to the scumminess that one JT provides, one of those players mentioned hasn't even played for United the last 15 years! Talk about scraping the barrel. John Terry is a bigger lying, cheating (on and off), racist scumbag than every United player of the last 20 years combined.
Looks like this accusation against Clattenburg is going to backfire spectacularly on Chelsea. They really need to learn that trying to discredit referees after every defeat is not a good long term strategy!
Congrats Ruff, you're now the Head of Programming for HBO. You don't get a job like that without loving the choc ices
Err, yes. Quite right. Next time you want something really ****ing obvious clearing up don't hesitate to ask.
I suppose there are eventually follow-on opportunities from holding up an advertising board in New York. His own sandwich board next...
It's not over yet. Chelsea haven't sat down with the FA and changed their story, based upon Clattenburg's statement, about what, when. where and how many times Clattenburg "abused" them. Now there's a single-issue, "hate crimes" fantatic lawyer on the case, Clattenburg needn't think that a complete lack of any corroborative evidence will save him from the FA's 'independent' panel. But two-faced, double-standards by the FA will probably do the trick.
Ah, the old "It's not racist so there" legal clincher. Do I need to post a TENTH copy of the FA's findings that cited Rio for references to race and skin colour?
No, because for the 100th time, I don't need the FA to tell me anything. A black man re quoting something someone else said on a website is not racism. I know this. I don't really care a **** what your or the FA's opinion is but I am interested to know why the FA are so right in this instance but wrong in the Suarez instance. No, I tell a lie, I don't give a **** about that either as I have my own opinion which you will never change.
So, if Evra had even been remotely telling the truth about what he was called and let's say it WAS 'ni^^^r", and Kuyt had actually heard it and said "Hahahaha, ni***r, that's classic!", you wouldn't have expected Kuyt to have been charged too. Btw, apart from avoiding drugs tests and endorsing racist comments about colleagues (and assaulting, even 'accidentally' female stewards by lashing out in temper) I would be instantly dismissed for gross misconduct if I beat up a wife or girlfriend, even if i wasn't eventually convicted for it. For some racism, even if it's ignorant rather than intentional, is the worse crime in the world. A 'hate' crime, no less (well when it's white on black anyway - though some on here, and lawyer Herbert too, don't seem too upset by half black on half black, for some reason). Beating up women, a-la-Giggs is accetable to all though. hence the views of that prime humbug Stanley Collymore. My daughter, like myself, is part Chinese: I'd rather she was racially abused than ****ing beaten up.
You do realise that my contribution to this thread was saying that it isn't ok for John Terry to call a black man a ****ing black **** during a football match because it's the heat of the moment? No? Go back and read. I have not brought Ferdinand into it, nor Suarez. So please, stop bringing them up as I am not ****ing interested. You got that? Not ****ing interested in a single word you have to say. Nothing you say will ever change what I think. Just for you, succintly, to sum up; John Terry = Racist **** Luis Suarez = wind up merchant who used racial abuse to get a rise out of a black player. It backfired. Good. Rio Ferdinand = not racist. At all. Not even a single bit. Defending his brother from the racial abuse of the man above, as an half decent man and brother would do. Missing drugs test, sexually misdemeanours, assault of any sort = totally irrelevant to the above argument. None of them validate his 'racism'.
"Defending his brother from the racial abuse of the man above, as an half decent man and brother would do." Nonsense. he was abetting the harrassment of a witness in a criminal court case because he didn't give evidence on the lines of some sort of racial 'loyalty'. Worse racism than Suarez, if not Terry.
