Don't get you? Why am I less qualified to judge that incident unless I watch it in slow motion? As useful as that option is it can somethimes warp what actually happens. Not clicking on the link btw.
Tell Wisdom Everton play like stoke when he was getting torn a new one before Suarez stomped on Mirallas.
Also not looking to get into a stupid argument just posting my opinion. Ha! ****ed that up, now I'm talking to myself.
Which is hardly a crime considering the number of fans who also make the same kind of unsubstantiable contentions, which are never supported by data, such as: Zonal is rubbish. Lucas only passes sideways and backwards. Rafa was too defensive. Rodgers is a quality manager.
And he's come across as a bitter **** who's knows **** all about football. It's clear to see from any neutral and as these comments have come out, even the neutrals have said Everton were playing the better football and have been all season.
Watching it again will give you the detail that you obviously missed the first time around, when you saw it in normal time & came to the misguided conclusion that it was an accident. By not viewing the slow mo I've provided you with (of both incidents) then all you're doing is sticking your fingers in your ears & giving it 'la la'. Odd.
I have seen the slow mo, and it doesn't change my opinion still see it as accidental, think we will have to agree to disagree.
This will probably make things worse but I don't think we intentionally kicked lumps out of Miralles, he was just on top form and (I hate to say it) we couldn't live with him. Not glad that he was injured but I was happy that he was no longer on the pitch.
It's called projection, you project all your seething hatred of Suarez on to him, and so you are convinced that he did it will malice while I can honestly explain both incidents away with enthusiasm and clumsiness. You'll never accept that, so what's the point of talking about it? AS they say, they never bother booing bad players. 17 posts on your account, and I bet they are all on our board. Obsess much?
Him going off was the difference, he was creating havoc down your right flank. I don't think that as a team you targeted him, but Suarez saw an opportunity to leave a foot in & took it. Result = off injured & we lost our impetus after that. Had he stayed on I think we'd have got a result.
Fixed. If you haven't clued in on it yet, you can't go on about all of that past stuff and then turn around and not give Rodgers, Borini, or his methods the time of day.
Suarez is a horror, that's my view of him, so I won't make out any different. I also think he's a very talented footballer. However, don't imply that my view on those incidents is skewed by bias & therefore devoid of objectivity, as it simply isn't. I wouldn't say I thought he was trying to injure our players if I didn't think he was. As for my post count, the EFC board on this site is a tumbleweed zone & the derby was Sunday, so excuse my presence, I hear RAWK is good for one view fits all kopites with no other views allowed, so you might like it there.
Nowhere near as cringeworthy as you using the words "as a neutral" Gerrard is wrong though. Its Stoke who have modelled themselves on Neverton not the other way round.
