Clattenberg was probably still annoyed his favourite team were denied victory in the last minute in the early game
if he called player a Spanish twat, this is not the Sunday pitch, its at the very least gross misconduct and the sack. FA will back corruptobugger to the hilt
Due to a blind lino Clutterbug is a dirty b@stard, was it him that thought good of Rooney's flying elbow
So, super douche and failure referee Mark Clattenberg is actually a proper scumbag, on the take and for sale. No surprise to you then that he's been affecting results for money for a long time. Premiership refereeing is stinking, not an honest 1 in the lot. Trying to Find an honest premiership ref is like trying to find an honest italian politician, they just don't exist.
Sorry, if the ref called somebody a Spanish twat it'll be trouble? Why: surely the fact that being called the trailer park trash, South American version wasn't punishable & every Tom, dick & united fan came on here & stated that despite UK employment law definitions there is a difference between racism & xenophobia it can't NOW be an offence. The predicted implosion of PL is taking place.
They have a valid point. No way two reds! That was a massive joke, for me! That was like a United v 'pool game: ludicrous officiating! CFC: I'm with you.
Yes abusing Chelsea players (if that's what happened) then handing the game to united (exactly what happened) has got nothing to do with united
Surely, with all the news about his personal llife his integrity is brought into question? If a person has to prove he is 'Fit and proper' to buy a football club, the same standards must be followed for Officials of the game?!
The same standards do apply. Unfortunately the FA criteria of fit and proper consists of who's fit and proper to gift united 3 points in the big games
Mark Clattenberg's over all refereeing display brought shame on English football. Alan Hansen said it was a great game for English football. But I think it was embarrassing, all because of the referee. He made so many wrong decisions, and it ended up making the difference in the game. If if he is found not guilty of these allegations he should be sacked for all the other stuff.
Right because racism and/or xenophobia had no possible influence on the impartial and unbiased refereeing that saw 2 of their players sent off and an offside winner allowed to stand. Who were Chelsea playing then if it had **** all to do with United? The other Manchester club perhaps? I'm not implying United had anything to do with his bias but if you can't admit that the possibility of an unfair advantage to you existed then you're a lost cause. A replay isn't a punishment to United. It's a removal of the advantage you may have been granted (solicited or not) and a chance to play the match again on an equal playing field.
