Same old conspiracy bullshit. Funny how no-one gave a **** when decision went against Man Utd mid week. Anyway, today made a nice change from all the times Man Utd have been ****ing robbed at Stamford Bridge.
This is exactly what it will be about. sorry I didn't men to come across the wrong way but this is a mountain out of a mole hill as usual.
If it is just a couple of swear words, then this could backfire horribly. You can just see his colleagues sending off a host of Chelsea players for foul language, can't you? If it's racism or xenophobia, then he'll get absolutely slaughtered for it and quite right, too.
I agree with the Chelsea posters. The club wouldn't pursue this if they didn't feel there was something in it, especially considering the recent John Terry allegations.
My first thoughts were if its swearing Chelsea are in for a horrid time. Do the refs have any sort of mouth pieces that may of picked up what he said? I know they wear them or did but are they on at all times?
Footballs not like other types of employment really. And tbh many a boss, chairman, leader or person in a position of authority has dished out a few swearwords when dealing with idiotic people.
I think refs should be able to kick the living **** out of any player for telling him to **** off etc that would sort them out. These players spit, blow bogeys out their nose and shout abuse as they want so if he has truned around and told a couple of them to **** off fair play, however if it was racist that's different of course. This is the real world and if were 100% serious a little name calling is childs play given children are starving in all parts of the globe and the ice caps are melting.
Think the club could be making a mistake. Comes across as sour grapes. We should move on and focus on getting a quality striker like rvp
Given the fracas over the Ferdinand incident its highly unlikely that our club would sign up to any complaint unless there's substance to it and it would have to be a darn sight more serious than the use of abusive language.
Should be sorted easily. The ref was miked up and while it wasnt recorded the assistants and 4th official will of heard every word.
The Guardian's saying that one was to Mikel and contained "language of a racist nature", whereas the other was to a white player and presumably wasn't racist. Could be xenophobic though, I guess. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/oct/28/mark-clattenburg-accused-racial-slur-chelsea
I made several posts on here before the game of my reservations about Clattenburg being put in charge of this one! It so happens he far exceeded my worst fears and has ruined what should have been a classic match! Add to that the suspensions that will now be added to our"missing list" and I have to say he now has to be dealt with in a court of law! I think he should given time in the clink for perverting the course of justice!
Rumour is the other player was Mata, whom he called 'a spanish twat.' I've already seen a lot of hypocrisy on this though. A Chelsea player was accused of using racist language and it was immediately accepted as fact. Chelsea player claims he was abused and its 'just sour grapes.'