Hall deal points to someone else paying for it!

I think the most significant pointer in this young man signing for us is that the TO is well and truly on.Black[pool couldn,t agree a package with him but we did unless you believe in fairies this points to someone else funding this deal surely

 

Leeds60, are you saying he's a fairy & we should believe in him?

 

He won't be on massive money, and Blackpool aren't big payers

 

Loan with a view to a permanent, if the T/O goes through we can sign him come January if it doesn't we allow him to move on, a no lose gamble

 

Its a loan. no TO he goes back. Even you can understand that cant you?

Edit: you beat me to ir Ristac.

 

WTF are you talking about???? Read my post again. It was an attempt at humour - not a statement as such. Do they do humour where you live?

 

I think Liw that Blackpool along with several other clubs have beaten us to many players in the loan marketInce for example you don,t think he will have come cheap not long ago they got D J Cambell on loan. tghe point I am trying to make is that under Bates this loan would not have been possible I believe as he has run out of readies

 

BTW I wasnt the only one to fail to recognise your little joke. Having read it again its just not funny!

 

I did say it was an attempt, didn't I?

 

I think we got the available wages from Thompson and Poleon going out on loan rather than anything else. Then we hope for some money to be available in January to pay for it. Its only rumoured to be 200k signing fee. Doubt he'd be on more than 4k a week as well to be honest

 

Leeds60.

If you are right that will possibly mean we might also sign other loanees ie Curtis Davies, George Boyd etc.

 

Yea, I don't think Hall has paid for it

 

As I like to put it, they can't all be winners. Chippy needs some special time to help him relax, anyone wanna pitch in and send him to Winstons?

 

I think we got the available wages from Thompson and Poleon going out on loan rather than anything else
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

They will be on peanuts, were probably paying towards it and its for 1 month


Leeds60

when they signed campbell, there totally wage bill was £5m.


This deal points to nothing

 

Bates did same thing re Pugh, why should this Hall deal seem strange?

 

Warnock has said he doesn't know if Hall can cut it at this level but he is hopeful, that sounds like a message/excuse going out to the player why he will be on a low wage and up to him to prove himself.

 

I think my statement has now been verified by todays news don,t you LIW

 

Do you believe everything the YEP writes?