Reuters - GFH are dead

Love the way people are trying to decode that joint statement in a futile attempt at saving LUST's credibility - lots of straws to clutch at

 

Says the boy who cried "Wolf! Wolf!" time after time throughout the summer.

This is exactly the type of voice we want representing our voice. LUST had been questioning GFH prior to the Reuters stories, Reuters view merely confirmed they were on the right track and should continue questioning on our behalf. If the deal with GFH falls through and they blame LUST, we should all praise our lucky stars we have such a good supporters' voice looking out for the long term future of our club

 

But LUST also said that Leeds fans could "dare to dream"


Dream of being another Pompey? You already have most of their players

 

Beats the nightmare of Millwoe down in the basement eh?

 

Yep - could you imagine sharing that basement with us for 6 seasons

 

Sheldon, everything I was informed was going on happened - it was a take over not investment, no £4m pumped into club as LUST claimed, Bates stalling because of a clause around potential debt claims, LUST never involved with the bid....shall I go on? Your ****ing "wolf wolf" attitude shows either a lack of intelligence to understand the truth or complete ****ing ignorance towards anything said against LUST. Just as you want LUST to challenge the club, I reserve the right to challenge them because they have shown themselves to be a bunch of liars, and poor ****ing representatives of Leeds United supporters. So please stop whining and contribute something meaningful otherwise don't expect to be taken seriously when you actually have something awesome to add.

 

Same houses, yes but we were always upstairs!

 

Maybe, but we actually own our part of the house!

 

Is that why you spend so much in the lower parts of the league each season?

Makes sense I suppose.

 

You said it was investment not takeover.

 

.

 

Jesus Simon, I'm never going to mess with you. Either you've got an incredible memory, or you've got dossiers on us all (influence of the Don?).

 

Thanks Simon. There was no need for me to reply, as I knew someone else would be able to go back to the original article and prove what had been said. I'm sure BS (nice acronym!) changed his mind time after time after time throughout the summer, claiming he was "in the know". But things changed in his mind so much that it didn't matter what he said - I'm sure wrote that at some point he would be able to claim he was in the know better than anyone else because he had covered every possible base.

 

They're all locked away in my "Evil Mod Stuff" filing cabinet.

 

In fact I don't really doubt that BS has a source, or that he believes the info he's getting, however it irked me a bit to see him claiming to have said it was a takeover all along even though that's clearly not the case, whether his source is right or wrong.





... of course there was one group that did say it was a takeover from the start, in fact the same group who broke news of a takeover in the first place.

 

Billy's been caught with his pants down

 

LOL....you guys are funneeeee

 

Are they funny because you have nothing to say?

This doesn't put you in a very good or reliable light I might add

 

He is hardly the only one in all this to have made a statement and the facts not bear it out. I thought we were parking this?

 

I know he isn't the only one but he has just claimed that he was right all along, no one else it claiming that. I don't care, I've never once been involved in this argument with BS but it really does make him look bad for his only comeback to be:

"LOL....you guys are funneeeee"