If you are a LUST member and you now feel they have ceased to represent your views and have started to represent something else. Then do not let them do it in your name. Resign your membership. Voice your own opinions and stop letting Gary Cooper pretend he is more important than he is. Ironically if LUST wont listen to the fanbase than the obvious thing to do is hit their income streams. They claimed doing this brought Bates to the table, I can only presume it might also get LUST back to what it was supposed to be. If you are content with how LUST have carried on then you can ignore the point raised in thiis thread without needing to respond, You have dozens of other threads in which to kiss Garys lardy arse..
I think you just have a grudge against LUST that won't go away no matter what they do. A lot of people feel this about bates, the only difference being that LUST are more likely to change how they do things. In the grand scheme of things, they haven't actually done anything wrong. You're just hating for the sake of hating. You haven't anything interesting to say so just have a go at someone to get noticed.
If you are a LUST member and you now feel they have ceased to represent your views and have started to represent something else, you should have contested them at the AGM. Where were you at your time of glory, chip boy? Bottle it, did you?
Firestarter back up to his old tricks, is he? Naughty little chippy. Not that I have a clue what he is saying unless someone replies with quote. Some people must like him with all his rep though.
Perhaps those that do, have already? Could have been done at last week's AGM. Did you go and do it? Know anyone who did? Perhaps most members are just fine with the organization and its leadership. Ken Bates and the rest never will be.
As I said last week once DH had debunked the myth I resigned my membership. Therefore I would not have any right to attend. I cannot be arsed to try and fight the good fight when it would be like knocking a head against a brick wall. Only time will tell how many members they lose, but it would suprise me if half stay in the clique.
I literally have no idea what your idea of "the good fight" is, because all you ever do is go on about how bad LUST is and not giving any sort of alternative.
The alternative is not having LUST............ That is not negative, it is more that LUST are not doing what they claim to be doing and have not helped in the TO proceedings. I have nothing new to add to my previous utterings as nothing new has happened since last week.
Hit LUST's income stream? By getting members with free memberships to resign? You're right, of course, all those zeros dropping off the balance sheet! Brain of Britain you are not !!!!
Perhaps you could have attended anyway (wasn't it an open meeting?) but in any event you couild have listened (still can) online. You cannot be arsed to actually listen to them but you can spend all the time being critical of them here? It does not add up, mate, sorry.
The intrinsic monetary value of 8000 members is an asset that can, does and will amount to an income stream. From £5 memberships, to merchandise, to potential advertising on websites all these things can be monetised. The fact you are not bright enough to see it does not make it inaccurate. But with I guess only 2000 members in a years time all this will be lost in anycase. As per normal you lot keep peddling your version of truth and to hell with the actualities.
I have listened, I just dont believe it. If i am wrong I will be big enough to admit it. But that will only be proved with facts, evidence and hindsight. I am bored of this and dont want to reignite this again as no one is going to change sides in the argument till judgement day.
Time to call a truce lads, all this animosity is getting me down. come on, kiss and make up, who's gonna be the bigger man(no GC jokes please chippie)and offer the olive branch.
I'm getting really tired of your nonsense. LUST had only 300 members last year. 8300 this year. 75 7 years ago. WTF has their income stream got to do with anything???? It's all unpaid work!! Think they had income of approx £2k in the last year. And made a loss. Again. So what?? Get back on the medication.
Fair play if you have listened. For clarification purposes, who do you believe instead of them? David Haigh? Do you not see that both could be right as DH's words appear to have been carefully chosen?
