That's true. I tried it once but the cafe owner took umbrage to me going into the kitchen and threw me out
Interesting how he's gonna do a longer online version. Though nobody will believe Bullard's story anyway. So it's pointless.
I believe there is a letters page in the Observer sports section if that helps in terms of getting an opposing view to the interviewer's opinion of what a "good egg" Bullard is. Incidentally TWF probably knows the answer to this - has Bullard started his coach badges training yet? As if he hasn't this idea of becoming a manager will fall at the first hurdle. Can someone also remind me of the stat that of the percentage of managers who are fired/resign from their first job who never get employed again (as I have a feeling Bullard would be one of these).
To be honest on Sunday I didn't want to be peed off by reading an article making out that individual was better than 99.9999999999999999999999 fans of any club he has played for knows he is. So that is my defence for the stupid question. Can I ask what was the exact point of publishing such an article was, if it wasn't to be a starting point for Bullard to be announcing his first foray into management at Burnley/Bolton/Blackburn (3 clubs which Bullard's former boss Brown could do a job at)- if anyone knows.
So basically you didn't want to read something you disagreed with? If there was ever an article that asserted what you lot believe, I'd read it. I've just had a hard time finding one for the past two years...
I only said on Sunday TWF - don't start quoting selectively with me. Tell us what "you lot believe" as I would love to know what I'm meant to believe. As far as I know we live in a society where we have freedom of thought - and it just so happens that the majority do not happen to believe what you believe about Bullard.
