Yeah - thuggery and malicious tackles are bad too. And maybe on a case-for-case basis an individual act of violence or an individual leg-breaking tackle is worse than any individual act of diving. But as something that is undermining the game as a whole in a really pernicious way I think that diving is the greater problem. It is hugely on the increase (whilst physical violence is on the decrease) and has a really bad effect on the game as a whole. Plus it makes referees' jobs so much more difficult when most of the players on the pitch are happy to go down when they expect contact. And thirdly the culture of stimulation spread beyond diving. Anyone remember Ibrahimovic (?) about ten years ago falling to the ground when someone touched his face? And he was mocked and villified for it? well that happened this summer in a game and all the pundits said was "You can't raise your hand there - he had to go" and were sympathetic with the guy rolling around like he had no choice!
But anyway - even if you don't think that diving is the number one problem with professional football games you've got to agree that it's one of the big problems haven't you? And what's more, unlike many of the other problems it has a simple solution - long bans as soon as video evidence proves a clear dive.
Just cos you can't deal with what you think is the number one problem does not mean to say that you should not deal with one that is slightly lower down the list.
And as for Alwaysright's point about replicating the manouvre "and see if you don't fall": well yeah - of course. It's called diving. It's a thing you do with your body to make it so you fall over. And as for the motorcycle analogy...Er I just don't swallow it.
Change the shirt that Bale is wearing into one with red torso and white sleeves and I bet most of those defending Bale now would not be bending over backwards justifying his every tiny movement in that dive. Or why he moved which leg when and what might have been going through his mind. And how no-one else can possibly know what Bale was thinking. They'd be thinking one very simple, true thought and there would be no doubt in their minds: dive.
No, I can't defend deliberate diving, or simulation, as they now call it. Yes, it's something that needs to be dealt with now before it becomes endemic in the game, as it has done here in Spain.
However, I would still maintain that, if we are talking about priorities for the ruling bodies to deal with, then the malicious thuggery of people like Charlie Adam should receive the highest possible penalty. In Rugby, you would certainly be banned for months for anything so malicious against another player. Some have been banned for years.