I'm not gonna post any more, but the guy from the RTC has absolutely tore that statement to shreds. An onlooker from the dark side would say he appears to be full of the beel
And if someone finds evidence then cool. If the SPL set up a body to do this then cool But you can't ask those judging to also look for evidence...come on
I heard that if Rangers get cleared of any wrong doing then we'll get £40 million compensation from HMRC and reinstated into the SPL as oldco with 10 points. Sebo23 told me
Celtic answered a specific charge relating to EBTs. They did not open the doors for investigation into these non-declared secondary payment schemes which AJ claims are widespread.
011001100111010101100011011010110010000001101111011001100110011000100000011011010110100101101110011001000111100100100000011110010110111101110101001000000110011001100101011011100110100101100001011011100010000001100010011000010111001101110100011000010111001001100100 <convert>
And until he provides evidence or testifies to who exactly broke sfa rules it remains hearsay A rangers manager shot a dog Which manager? Where is the dog?
I don't understand whats wrong with what he said, why couldn't you just answer it instead of being a ****ing mysterious beeler?
I don't recall quoting you on this thread so unless you are gifted with psychic powers and know EXACTLY what he meant then perhaps you should let him reply on his own if he cares to.
So I'll take that as you refusing to answer a fairly simple question. Your green goggles show up at the best of times dev, one wee suggestion that Celtic allow themselves to be investigated and massive levels of beel are recorded on the beelometer.
I'm beeling yet you are the one firing out insults ? Anyhoo seeing as how you are obviously telepathically linked tell me, was Squiggy being "Serious"?
It's very simple, Dev. Johnston alleges that all the clubs make regular non-declared payments to players. If this is the case, the current investigation into Rangers is rank hypocrisy. If you think he's talking bollocks, what's your objection to investigating his claim?