The difference is that we've actually won the title, unlike you, who have never ended above us, or caused any power shift in North London, in DECADES. So you're comparing apples and oranges, even if our chances of the title is remote, you can't compare it to your hopes of a North London shift, as the last time that was a reality was AGESSSSSSSSSSSSS AGO. Plus, we most likely won't win the title, but you'll still end up below us, and still be in our shadows, ;-). Oh yeah, and even if you have a chance of finishing above us in February that would mean jack sh!t, cause last I checked, you were already way ahead of us last season by the time February hit, and we still ended above you. So whether it's February, March, April, or even May, you will, AS USUAL, fall behind us. Now go get your shine box.
Difference between Arsenal and Spurs; 11/12 1 point, 10/11 6 points, 09/10 5 points. Difference between Arsenal and the title winners; 11/12 19 points, 10/11 12 points, 09/10 11 points. Fairly obvious which one is becoming more likely and which one is becoming a distant dream.
Jesus these lot just never learn, or they are totally stupid, seem to think they have a right to be in the top 4 despite finishing in the top 4 twice in 20 years. Its a tough call between then and liverpool for the most deluded, at least Liverpool do have some great history.
And they wonder why we call them deluded ? Poor fellow must have a pretty dire sex life to be questioning which one is better . . .
And how exactly do you come to that conclusion? Of the current top 4 teams, how many of your players would get into their teams, bale and walker are the only 2, therefore to suggest your squad is good enough for the top 4 is very debatable at best. You sold 2 very good players and bought in players that are of a lower standard, something you lot slated us for doing in the past.
That's exactly the same as us saying that we don't have a right to win the title, just that our squad is good enough.
United - Walker, Kaboul, Dembele and Bale would all get into their first 11. City - Kaboul, Sandro/Parker, Dembele and Bale would all get into the first 11. Chelsea - Kaboul, Sandro/Parker, Dembele, Bale and Lennon. Arsenal - Friedel, Kaboul, Benny, Dembele, Bale and Defoe/Ade. That's not what having a strong squad is all about though. Anyway, I was just explaining what he meant as you seemed confused and I don't think he looks on your board so couldn't stand up for himself. But it's not Anyway, I'd agree you saying your squad is good enough to win the title is not the same as saying you have a right to win it. In fact it's very obvious the two are not the same.
I find it hard to believe that if dembele would get into any of the top 4 starting 11 that none of them even enquired about him far less put in a bid. You have however just strengthened my claim that spurs fans are deluded with the above comment, so thanks for helping to back up my claim.
United did but they have no money "Deluded" is easily the most overused and incorrectly used word on this forum. It's my opinion, if you disagree you might be better off calling me biased but best not to go for "deluded", Newcastle fans that predicted them challenging for top 4 last season would've been considered "deluded
You are taking the piss right ? Szczesny>Friedel Vermaelen>Kaboul Benny maybe? Take your pick>Dembele Cazorla>Bale Podolski>Ade/Defoe
