Charles Green said it, several of the Rangers bloggers say it every day, Leggo, Bill McMurdo, Chris Graham and Bill Poole have all said it. Are you suggesting that anyone who wanted to see Rangers fail was motivated solely by âBigotryâ? I donât follow that logic. And Rangers have their share of nutters too, is Leggo more stable than McGillivan? What about Bill McMurdo? I donât know about the âMutual respectâ part but I tend to agree with the other parts. I donât know of ANY Journalist who has argued that titles should be stripped. If heâs out there then Iâve not read it. The Penn state comparisons have already been laid out. As for the âsinisterâ, I make no bones about wanting to see Rangers stripped of titles but thatâs not a punishment any more than a housebreaker having to hand back stolen goods is, and neither are my motives for wanting Rangers titles stripped. In my eyes if it is proved they broke the rules then they can have no complaint about handing back that which they had no right to in the first place.
I can just see him now huffin and puffin reading through all these blogs. Like an addict he doesn't want to read on but he can't help himself.
If they were only concerned with Rangers you may have had a point, sadly they are not, in general they are about evil cabals and Anti Rangers hate driven by Catholics and other people of ill repute. You would like them.
Do you not think you have a nerve to talk considering your numerous posts which were merged into one giant liefest? As I explained, if those bloggers were simply talking about Rangers then you may have had a point, they seldom talk about Rangers and are convinced that the world is against them, they are fair game as far as I am concerned. Do you think they are beyond reproach? Do you agree with their views? If not why are you attempting to defend them?
Green stated the decision making seems to have been driven by bigotry. There's no need to twist his words, he gives everyone a good laugh as it is. No, that's not what I said. There are many people within the celtc support who are more interested in watching everything we do in case something is wrong or offensive rather than supporting their own team. You don't follow much logic. Haywire from Prison Break is more stable than the bold Phil. I don't read Leggo as he is another "investigative journalist" who is just a waste of time. McMurdo I haven't read yet but he is one who may know "where the bodies are buried" when it comes to certain people. I probably still won't read though unless I get a lot of spare time, I have better things to do with my life. Chris Graham is articulate and sane (a rarety for a blogger) he is well worth listening to from a Rangers point of view. His recent article chinning that clown Thomson was pretty good. It worried me that you trawl these blogs. What are you hoping to achieve? Again, health advice is here once you realise you need it. Mutual respect is where both supporters could happily give as good as they got and we'd never get violence. It has become very sinister lately, well certainly since helicopter Sunday anyway from what I've noticed. Stop reading Rangers blogs. By whom? I haven't seen it anywhere. BBC ran the Penn State story, I wonder if Chris McLaughlin would happily cover the Torbett files in relation to this? Awful comparison. The fact is EBT's were not illegal during their use, the SPL never pulled us up despite audited accounts submitted every season (apart from Whyte's fun & games which I really hope he gets come-uppance from) and any "side payments" are a nonsense and nothing more than a club handing them a car or any other incentive. My work don't have to disclose any bonuses of mine to the ICE or the company auditors. The SPL are chasing a green & grey shadow on money they don't have. Irony? I nearly pished myself.
dunno frank if the method of administering of the ebts was incorrect then it is tax evasion and not avoidance - perhaps not intentional but who gives a **** - but that is the key to whether or not they were "illegal" - **** word to use but you know what i mean and we dont know what the spl saw or didnt see in terms of accounts so that is conjecture what we DO know is that i am beeling about this
