Is Who-ton as good as Lambert?

Your lot loves complaining to the moderators.

 

First off northampton, Thats a bit rich coming from somebody off the board that has probably banned the most members from visiting, I will say again on my families lives i didn't complain about croweythehairdresserIQ66, maestro took this off his own back because he knew that himself and dave could fully inforce the rules on this board while their members abused other users. I hope that when Dave/maestro read this they will have the balls to tell the truth(which i'm sure they have) that i didn't complain about croweythehairdresserIQ66 comments.

second, I find it quite amusing that another thread has started asking the exact same question yet wasn't classed as wum thread, why i find it amusing is because i actually gave 100% true facts to back my arguement up, yet got a torrent of abuse, yet the other thread was purely opinion based yet was almost given gold star status. Why is that i ask you? there must be only 1 reason and that is because i gave a conclusion (based on facts and not opinion) that you lot didn't like/agree with.

 

It's quite simple to answer Guru, you are normally a wum. Plain and simple! Even you must be able to understand that?

 

Thing is Lulu of Ipshit,i never said you did complain.

Why dont you take a leaf from Wellys book and man up for christs sake.This post has had far to many replies than it deserves.Enough now i think.

 

Thing is croweythehairdresserIQ66, I don't give a **** what you call me, anybody can be the big man from behind the computer screen. What you do is make the good work that meastro and Dave do harder because if they have to ban people from this board they get called hypocrites because of brainless idiots like yourself.

 

Blaaady ell Guru are you still here?

You came here on the wind up and you've ended up winding yourself up chasing shadows.

Be gone!

 

So are you saying my statistics are wrong then thai?

 

That was not the point of my post and you know it - wum

and as pointed out several times the stats are pretty meaningless, you cannot draw any meaningful comparisons or conclusions from them because they were played under different circumstances and largely by different teams

 

talk about a crazy situation, when opinion is fact, and fact is wummery!

 

So then, in that case don't you agree that opinions are just as meaningless? at least at the moment there is documentry data to prove my theory correct, where is the documentry proof for the opinions?

 

Lulu,please **** off.

 

Opinions and "facts" as quoted by yourself are very different animals. I will try to make the point with this way over the top example.

In 1986, Queen the band were far bigger and better than the Spice girls as a current band. In 1996 the Spice Girls were a bigger far better current band than Queen.
Why? The Spice Girls were still going through puberty when Queen were massive. in 1996 Queen we no longer an active band and the Spice Girls were a huge success by that time.

Pretty meaningless really but some fruit loops would argue over it

 

And your point is thai?

 

at what point should i start ****ting myself!

 

It's bloody meaningless! I was hoping that may have sunk in by now

 

Guru - There are 3 issues:
Lies
Damn Lies
Statisitics

What you've quoted is statistics and as Thai pointed out both teams had at least 4 different players who didn't play in the corresponding fixture last season. Whilst you can argue that what you're saying is true - comparison isn't fair and any Canaries fan I've spoken to is very happy with our last 2 performances though we feel we could easily have had 6 points rather than 2!!