1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

MOD's: Last chance to save the Sunderland board

Discussion in 'Sunderland' started by Cest Advocaat, Sep 2, 2012.

  1. Cest Advocaat

    Cest Advocaat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    13,129
    Likes Received:
    230
    A blanket ban on A skunk by another name (or as we all know its Chiek); Obertan; John Humble; Tash (he WUMS more than he posts sense) must be made immediately, or the few remaining good Sunderland fans will disappear day by day, until there wont be any sunderland fans here to make it worth. Their IP addresses must be known to the people running this site, so monitoring them under whatever new names they keep popping up with should be easily policed and their complete banning easily effected. Any others that come on doing likewise should be removed and banned.

    Any mag that wants to come over and have a bit of crack is very welcome and that is how it should be but those tat just want to disrupt and spoil are not and should be removed to allow good banter to resume again. I don't see why on a Sunderland board my only option is to 'ignore' them when they are still going to ruin the threads and posts of others. This may well be an open site but that has to come with responsibility, or else it fails on all counts. At the end of the day, this is a Sunderland forum and it is to Sunderland fans the MOD's are best acting on behalf.

    I am sick and tired of their attempts to ruin the Sunderland board with their daily obsession on here. They don't come to chat they come to piss people off and just ruin the crack between fellow Sunderland fans. Their contributions ALWAYS end in chaos and slanging matches and that's exactly what they want. Its a shame that lads like Sombrero and QWOP are tarred with the same brush as they often post funny and interesting stuff that is worth having a bit crack with.

    It up to the Sunderland MOD's to act now, or face losing this once excellent site for good.
     
    #1
  2. A mag by any other name...

    A mag by any other name... Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2012
    Messages:
    701
    Likes Received:
    13
    MOD'S: Last chance to save the Sunderland board

    We need a blanket ban on people like Cestriamackem and MackemsRule, their determination to derail threads by posting inane pictures and abusive comments is bringing the forum down. This has been confirmed by people who have left the site citing that Mags were not the main reason for them leaving. He who shouts loudest is not always right, Cest has been told on many occassions that he is just as bad as any Newcastle fan, yet he just ignores these posts and continues to blindly lay the blame at everyone else's feet.

    PS this site was so excellent that you once threatened to leave it for good <doh> fail.

    What a pathetic internet warrior you are, the site will never thrive so long as your arrogant and obnoxious views are welcome, didn't I see you saying that someone calling some was a lazy ****ing ****** on TV didn't warrant being banned??? <laugh> <doh>
     
    #2
  3. Nads

    Nads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    38,065
    Likes Received:
    39,763
    Look Cest,

    We, the mods, stated clearly 4 weeks back, that we are always available via PM, if anhone wants a post deleted , or a person banned, we'd look at it.

    Not ONE PM, and several cases of Sunderland fans starting it, then complaining when it escalates.

    We're here to help, and we'll always look at it through red & white eyes, but you guys have to help us out.

    Attacking people when they WUM etc, fine.

    Attacking them because they aren't Sunderland fans, wrong.

    Can I ask all to say their feeling on this thread, then me and Talc & Sid will discuss it.
     
    #3
  4. Nads

    Nads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    38,065
    Likes Received:
    39,763
    Can I ask you to leave this thread for a couple of hours, rather than me delete stuff, and myself, Sid & Talc will get all sorted.

    If you can't do that, then you are proving Cest right, in essense.

    Cest, don't react to this one please, let's keep the thread civil and get it done once and for all, yeah?
     
    #4
  5. BillySmartsCircus

    BillySmartsCircus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    824
    Likes Received:
    9
    thought you only joined in august??


    mods - this guys is spamming every single thread we have, trying to cause arguments and pissing people off. think he needs a time out.


    in any case, he's clearly someone we've had here before with a new user name who we've previously removed.
     
    #5
  6. smithy in nl

    smithy in nl Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    4,745
    Likes Received:
    6,597
    they do seem to ruin a lot of threads like but like you say a few of them are alright, its hard to say what to do for the best imo good luck mod's :(
     
    #6

  7. Commachio

    Commachio Rambo 2021

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    92,685
    Likes Received:
    43,150
    Up the revolution.

    Mush and co....damned if they do, damned if they don't..
     
    #7
  8. ...And Out Come the Wolve

    ...And Out Come the Wolve New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    92
    The fact that we have gotten into this situation speaks volumes.
     
    #8
  9. BillySmartsCircus

    BillySmartsCircus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    824
    Likes Received:
    9
    it's the constant disruption and the damning with faint praise, it's all set up to wind people up.


    back on the old 606, the mods would have removed this guy. they may have been akin to the gestapo in their methods, but they kept threads free from bullshit and all the fans engaged. the exact opposite is happening here, which is, i expect, what this kid wants.
     
    #9
  10. Schwerer Gustav

    Schwerer Gustav Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,536
    Likes Received:
    85
    he does not "create debate" does he?

    Mag by any other name admitted on an article named after him that he only comes on here not to be positive about Sunderland, taken in context with the volume of posts he makes then I think speaks volumes and I hope the mods will sort him out once and for all.
     
    #10
  11. vauxsamson

    vauxsamson Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,309
    Likes Received:
    1
    Why not create an informal standing rule;

    Any poster who deliberately acts like a prick, either through being a wum, or causes the forum to react in a manner not conducive to decent debate will be banned for a period of ......... (days/weeks/permanent) depending upon the post(s) repeat offenders will be ****ed of completely.

    MODS decision will be final.
     
    #11
  12. hordenmackem

    hordenmackem Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    341
    MonMush, I just want to say that I have been a member of this site from its early creation. I left because of the constant interference and irrelevant comments by Mags. I was still reading the posts but just decided not to get involved. As the time past it has gotten slightly better but I truly can't understand whythey feel the constant need t come on her sprouting ****e. I never go on the scum board because I don't support that team.

    I don't envy a Mods job.s
     
    #12
  13. ...And Out Come the Wolve

    ...And Out Come the Wolve New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    92
    The honest mags suffer for it as well. The stuff that comes their way wouldn't be so bad if people claiming to be mags weren't so hell bent on doing what they do.
     
    #13
  14. Deleted #

    Deleted # Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    20,571
    Likes Received:
    9,877
    I am really fed up now to the point where I just can't be arsed logging in on a night time.

    It's the same people, Rancid Toe you will have noticed has made a couple of threads at least, along the lines of 'he is there to clear the wumming' you know the daft spotty teenager kind of patter. He is continually on the board having digs and as of yet, I have seen no constructive feedback or debate from him. A mag by another name is clearly also on the WUM, he makes points in which you can see straightaway is going to cause hostility and only here to disrubt the board.

    There's some very good mag posters on here, the likes of jarra mag, qwop, jesus was a geordie and even Tash. I can see where people are coming from with Tash but to me it's not him wumming he is just clearly passionate and black and white daft but if you read into what he is saying he can be constructive and gives reason to his arguments. He is the same on the Newcastle board (even they think he is a bit daft).

    If you could block IP addresses that would be perfect but i'm not sure if you can. Also that is your job, not mine.

    All the best sorting it out lads, I will support you's whatever you decide <ok>. Thanks
     
    #14
  15. bonnybobbypark

    bonnybobbypark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,463
    Likes Received:
    750
    This is a delicate issue. Whilst I don't want this forum to turn into some sort of Mackem Apartheid Republic, only airing our views, I dont want every thread stuffed by moronic geordies. They know what they are doing. Should be a yellow/ red card system if it is practical and can be managed. Proven wum, 1st strike. Do it again anywhere, any time, 2nd strike and out for a timed ban.

    Any good?

    x
     
    #15
  16. Nads

    Nads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    38,065
    Likes Received:
    39,763
    This looks a workable, and fair suggestion.
     
    #16
  17. Nads

    Nads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    38,065
    Likes Received:
    39,763
    Another good suggestion.
     
    #17
  18. Deleted #

    Deleted # Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    20,571
    Likes Received:
    9,877
    Just be careful that's all. We should all have the right to crack the odd joke at each other, it's what we do best. We can't jump on everyone for 1 little remark and especially if it's few and far between. It takes away the good natured and respected rivalry that the majority of posters on both sides have for one and another.

    Repeat offenders who do not have any constructive posts, that's the posters that should be targeted with a zero tollerance approach to show that it will not be tolerated on either board.
     
    #18
  19. SC SAFC

    SC SAFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,574
    Likes Received:
    320
    simple solution

    Dont bite!! Its not a case of not sticking up for Sunderland, fellow mackems or yourself. Just bloody ignore it, don't put them on ignore list. Just dont rise to the comments you find to be wummy ( lol @ wummy). Soon will stop, just like in real life.

    I only ever come on here to read what other football fans are thinking. Not really interested in posting to much (mostly cos im a boring ****, and ne one wants to read what i post haha) , but you bastards have made me post in a vein attempt to kick start some footy talk, further lowering my self esteem. Cheers:emoticon-0150-hands
     
    #19
  20. bonnybobbypark

    bonnybobbypark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,463
    Likes Received:
    750
    My way would stop the trolling there and then.

    x
     
    #20

Share This Page